I'm not sure that assessing a bloke's character 10

? years on is helpful. But. as it's that or do some work, I'll have a crack
All I remember (and I didn't go half as much) was that it was very odd and cliquey around the ground during the whole thing. There were some mutterings about how the vote went, but equally I've heard just as many mutterings about this chap too. One thing I will say that he's usually mentioned as being in some kind of dispute with anyone, clients, neighbours, The Rugby..
Andy used to kindly take me to a few games at this point and I remember years ago him explaining how being a members club meant serious investors are reluctant to come in. It's both a blessing and a curse- and that's the real underlying issue here perhaps as we look at what to do next.
Tony Keen took a fair punt inlooking for a public/private thing through the development, which was very much in vogue especially under Labour. That's would have been the only middle way, but because of the recession as much as owt else it didn't come off, so do we have a straight choice between the following:
1) Relinquish alleged control of the club to allow further investment/pay off loans and progress on the park quicker, at the risk..well we all know the risks.
2) Stay as a members based, community club - do it properly,and work not a penny out of our means and perhaps watch a better coached, intergated generation of local players wrestle with the might of Skelmersdale for a while why we sort out between ourselves how to run it more efficiently. It would be the ultimate test of those who insist we wouldn't endup with 3-400 gates like we once had historically.
I don't see an aleternative beyond what has been tried re the development.