blue nige wrote: ↑Tue Jul 19, 2022 2:54 pm
[quote=bluebird90 post_id=495272 time=<a href="tel:1658237159">1658237159</a> user_id=381]
[quote="Jon D" post_id=495266 time=<a href="tel:1658228610">1658228610</a> user_id=170]
What so taking your nephew to football is associated with noncinng. Think your computer needs checking fantasising over men abusing boys at the football.
Clearly not. If you can’t tell the difference between taking a nephew to the football (which is what they’re asking you to do) and children meeting up with unrelated adults and taking pictures which are then posted on social media then you need to take a serious look at yourself.
Safeguarding is about preventing risks to vulnerable people, that’s what the club are doing. I can’t see why anybody in the right mind would have an issue with that.
[/quote]
based on what events that have happened to initiate this decision it's bullsh** and everyone knows that !, and what are these risks? please share them and WHY didn't you bring them to the attention of the club?
[/quote]
The risks are with society in general. There is people out there that take advantage of children, you can see that by numerous well-publicised reports which are common place. Football isn’t an escape from that, it’s an event that children attend and if they’re alone there is a risk.
Safeguarding aims to prevent children from coming into contact with people who may take advantage of them. Any adult working and volunteering with children needs to be checked for that reason. If something is put in place to protect kids, then I’ll happily support it.
All this does is enable children to be able to go to a known adult should something happen. Not a great deal to ask.