Carlisle v Barrow match thread

For all things Barrow AFC. Keep discussions civil and fair, we're all Barrow aren't we!
mall
Platinum Member
Posts: 2693
Joined: Sun Mar 15, 2015 2:11 pm
Contact:

Re: Carlisle v Barrow match thread

Post by mall » Thu Feb 02, 2023 12:42 pm

"about 40 of our most vociferous fans were turned back to Barrow by Cumbria Police at some point in their journey. All had match tickets and searches indicated no pyrotechnics etc. Anyone who believes in civil liberties might expect questions be asked about this. One for the lawyers, perhaps."

Would like to know more about this.

Main Stand SeasonTct
Platinum Member
Posts: 3092
Joined: Sun Aug 06, 2017 5:05 pm
Contact:

Re: Carlisle v Barrow match thread

Post by Main Stand SeasonTct » Thu Feb 02, 2023 12:49 pm

mall wrote: Thu Feb 02, 2023 12:42 pm "about 40 of our most vociferous fans were turned back to Barrow by Cumbria Police at some point in their journey. All had match tickets and searches indicated no pyrotechnics etc. Anyone who believes in civil liberties might expect questions be asked about this. One for the lawyers, perhaps."

Would like to know more about this.
Vociferous ?Probably known trouble makers and police intel probably alerted the police that they were attempting to attend. Job well done imo

blumooncrab
Bronze Member
Posts: 988
Joined: Sat Aug 18, 2018 1:05 pm
Contact:

Re: Carlisle v Barrow match thread

Post by blumooncrab » Thu Feb 02, 2023 1:07 pm

bluessupporter wrote: Thu Feb 02, 2023 12:29 pm
Great, honest, and a joy to read, even if I did have to look up what onanism meant! Have to say that was a particularly good word to use about that particular man! :lol:
Beautiful prose : I bet Phillips himself had to look it up ! :skill: :D

FanzoneFan
Veteran Member
Posts: 644
Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2022 11:36 am
Contact:

Re: Carlisle v Barrow match thread

Post by FanzoneFan » Thu Feb 02, 2023 2:07 pm

bluessupporter wrote: Thu Feb 02, 2023 9:09 am
Jim wrote: Thu Feb 02, 2023 8:41 am

Regarding the RC post-match, it was particularly tastless, or perhaps thoughtless.

It is not hard to imagine that if the scores had been reversed and Carlisle had been hammered 5-1, the post match would have been a discussion between Phillips and Lumsden about Carlisle's failings rather than how brilliant Barrow were.
Yes must admit I found the highlights of the Carlisle commentary that featured Philips and Lumsden was particularly ott in putting down Barrow. I thought the BBC was supposed to be neutral when they cover the whole of Cumbria but this was once again like Radio Carlisle to the exclusion of Barrow.

I listened to Adam and Goody whilst watching iFollow and their reactions were far more measured. I suppose to some extent this was inevitable given the way the match was going but judging by the Carlisle highlights I heard just before 10 it was far more professional.

I hope Adam gets his wish to work full-time for the beeb, because listening on Tuesday he was far more professional than one of those who is already there.
I think we should give Radio Cumbria a break they had five people at the game on Tuesday night - A presenter and two commentary teams of two people each - I also know AJ can’t drive so most away games he has to travel by train and following him on Twitter it seems it often involves a 2 night stay because he can’t get back after most matches. This week I think he’s having a 3 night stay because there’s a train strike on Friday. All of this coverage isn’t cheap but Radio Cumbria are prepared to throw money at it. Keep up the good work.

User avatar
Sea Dog Sam
Bronze Member
Posts: 790
Joined: Wed Jul 28, 2021 3:47 pm
Contact:

Re: Carlisle v Barrow match thread

Post by Sea Dog Sam » Thu Feb 02, 2023 3:29 pm

Main Stand SeasonTct wrote: Thu Feb 02, 2023 12:49 pm
mall wrote: Thu Feb 02, 2023 12:42 pm "about 40 of our most vociferous fans were turned back to Barrow by Cumbria Police at some point in their journey. All had match tickets and searches indicated no pyrotechnics etc. Anyone who believes in civil liberties might expect questions be asked about this. One for the lawyers, perhaps."

Would like to know more about this.
Vociferous ?Probably known trouble makers and police intel probably alerted the police that they were attempting to attend. Job well done imo
If they were known - but hadn't being prosecuted/received banning orders from the courts - then what Cumbria Police did was infringe the liberties of those 40 fans.

I don't know where Mall (who made the initial post) received his information but he posted the comment in speech marks so I presume it was a comment made by somebody else. Those prevented from attending (unless banned) should seek legal advice on this matter.
Shiver Me Timbers

MisterPleasant
BarrowAFC Veteran
Posts: 5170
Joined: Fri Aug 28, 2020 10:29 am
Contact:

Re: Carlisle v Barrow match thread

Post by MisterPleasant » Thu Feb 02, 2023 4:14 pm

Sea Dog Sam wrote: Thu Feb 02, 2023 3:29 pm
Main Stand SeasonTct wrote: Thu Feb 02, 2023 12:49 pm

Vociferous ?Probably known trouble makers and police intel probably alerted the police that they were attempting to attend. Job well done imo
If they were known - but hadn't being prosecuted/received banning orders from the courts - then what Cumbria Police did was infringe the liberties of those 40 fans.

I don't know where Mall (who made the initial post) received his information but he posted the comment in speech marks so I presume it was a comment made by somebody else. Those prevented from attending (unless banned) should seek legal advice on this matter.
If you read the article "A fan writes..." it's in there:

https://bluebirdstrust.co.uk/all-bluebi ... iv3xaCaTd8
Last edited by MisterPleasant on Thu Feb 02, 2023 4:29 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Don't let the old man in.

User avatar
Wintergreen
BarrowAFC Veteran
Posts: 7439
Joined: Fri May 30, 2008 12:38 pm
Location: The Blue Planet
Contact:

Re: Carlisle v Barrow match thread

Post by Wintergreen » Thu Feb 02, 2023 4:25 pm

I think there was a post late Tuesday night about it which was subsequently taken down. Sounds like they have been deemed guilty of ‘Thoughtcrime’ by the Thought Police. Has it come to this in the county?
We will follow the soccer, over land and sea...

User avatar
Sea Dog Sam
Bronze Member
Posts: 790
Joined: Wed Jul 28, 2021 3:47 pm
Contact:

Re: Carlisle v Barrow match thread

Post by Sea Dog Sam » Thu Feb 02, 2023 4:37 pm

MisterPleasant wrote: Thu Feb 02, 2023 4:14 pm
Sea Dog Sam wrote: Thu Feb 02, 2023 3:29 pm

If they were known - but hadn't being prosecuted/received banning orders from the courts - then what Cumbria Police did was infringe the liberties of those 40 fans.

I don't know where Mall (who made the initial post) received his information but he posted the comment in speech marks so I presume it was a comment made by somebody else. Those prevented from attending (unless banned) should seek legal advice on this matter.
If you read the article "A fan writes..." it's in there:

https://bluebirdstrust.co.uk/all-bluebi ... iv3xaCaTd8

Cheers :D
Shiver Me Timbers

Matty
BarrowAFC Veteran
Posts: 5317
Joined: Tue Nov 09, 2010 9:57 pm
Location: Barrow
Contact:

Re: Carlisle v Barrow match thread

Post by Matty » Thu Feb 02, 2023 6:01 pm

Can someone summarise what Lumsden had to say? Listened to Simpson's interview and had to say they were genuine comments and he saw what I saw in the game.
Popular side since '03.

HenneysKnee
BarrowAFC Veteran
Posts: 8280
Joined: Wed Jun 29, 2011 10:28 pm
Contact:

Re: Carlisle v Barrow match thread

Post by HenneysKnee » Thu Feb 02, 2023 6:26 pm

Matty wrote: Thu Feb 02, 2023 6:01 pm Can someone summarise what Lumsden had to say? Listened to Simpson's interview and had to say they were genuine comments and he saw what I saw in the game.
The Carlisle fan on after the game (Brunton Bugle podcast I think it was called) was spot on as well. He was honest there was nowt in the game until the offside goal
Have seen the goal clips RC tweeted out, baring in mind James Philips may commentate on us at some point if Adam had to miss for any reason the send him back to the national league type stuff was a bit OTT to say the least


behind the goals
Gold Member
Posts: 2182
Joined: Fri Jan 24, 2014 9:44 pm
Contact:

Re: Carlisle v Barrow match thread

Post by behind the goals » Thu Feb 02, 2023 7:49 pm

People say the truth hurts but Carlisle deserved the win, yes close first half but that second half we were well beaten by the better side all day long, to many times we looked so poor all over the pitch, Pete Wild making out we gifted Carlisle the win is pure BS from the podcast we were CRAP, the manager has some big decisions to make on several players who are out of contract, who does he want to offer new contracts too at the moment would it really matter if none were kept on. Hopefully our other new signings will get enough game time to see what they bring to the side.

Etsjb
Senior Member
Posts: 289
Joined: Thu Jul 15, 2021 3:17 pm
Contact:

Re: Carlisle v Barrow match thread

Post by Etsjb » Thu Feb 02, 2023 11:31 pm

Of course it was a sub-optimal, below par performance and we are all hurting including PW. His comments are not incorrect as individual errors were our downfall along with the offside 1st goal (see the video stills). But I unfortunately had to listen to Philips and Lummocks on my Ifollow feed and they are sooo biased it is embarrassing, I get they are Carlisle comms but I know for a fact Adam and Goody would be more measured and respectful. P&L laughing about incidents leading to goals, they were also like that v Hartlepool the other week when Garner left a foot in and the Pools player ended up with a frac-pac on and needed a stretcher to get back to tunnel. Disgraceful especially from an ex-pro.

But hey, we have to move on, to dwell on this is not healthy, lets forget this feeling until we play them again, we need to show the team and club our support despite the hurt.

Pedro
Platinum Member
Posts: 3452
Joined: Wed May 06, 2015 11:23 pm

Re: Carlisle v Barrow match thread

Post by Pedro » Fri Feb 03, 2023 12:11 am

Etsjb wrote: Thu Feb 02, 2023 11:31 pm Of course it was a sub-optimal, below par performance and we are all hurting including PW. His comments are not incorrect as individual errors were our downfall along with the offside 1st goal (see the video stills). But I unfortunately had to listen to Philips and Lummocks on my Ifollow feed and they are sooo biased it is embarrassing, I get they are Carlisle comms but I know for a fact Adam and Goody would be more measured and respectful. P&L laughing about incidents leading to goals, they were also like that v Hartlepool the other week when Garner left a foot in and the Pools player ended up with a frac-pac on and needed a stretcher to get back to tunnel. Disgraceful especially from an ex-pro.

But hey, we have to move on, to dwell on this is not healthy, lets forget this feeling until we play them again, we need to show the team and club our support despite the hurt.
Radio sheep dip always promotes Carisle more than Barrow.
I would go to say that the proposals who comment on their games are very poor compared to Adam and John Goodwin who are both impartial and balanced and far superior .
The guy who keeps going on about Derby is totally unprofessional and very poor.
PW keeps saying he wants good people who are honest.
Well Pete you have this season to sort things out.
Carlisle taught us a lesson but in Simpson who I hate to listen to he has a voice that would turn a glass eye to sleep.
He is experienced and has managed to turn Carlisle around.
PW cannot keep saying we were unlucky he needs to be honest and have another game plan.
Wholesale changes to personnel is needed in the summer and a better performance in Saturday.

User avatar
BarrowLad71
Veteran Member
Posts: 569
Joined: Sun Apr 03, 2022 6:45 pm
Contact:

Re: Carlisle v Barrow match thread

Post by BarrowLad71 » Fri Feb 03, 2023 8:01 am

Main Stand SeasonTct wrote: Thu Feb 02, 2023 12:49 pm
mall wrote: Thu Feb 02, 2023 12:42 pm "about 40 of our most vociferous fans were turned back to Barrow by Cumbria Police at some point in their journey. All had match tickets and searches indicated no pyrotechnics etc. Anyone who believes in civil liberties might expect questions be asked about this. One for the lawyers, perhaps."

Would like to know more about this.
Vociferous ?Probably known trouble makers and police intel probably alerted the police that they were attempting to attend. Job well done imo
Lol, talking shite. Group of people who were searched at a service station outside Carlisle with no issues from the officers there. Then searched in a car park and held for 40 minutes with no explanation. All searches came up with nothing. All had match tickets and were treated like prisoners. But if that’s what you say.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 20 guests