Page 3 of 4
Re: Danny Lazy Rowe
Posted: Wed May 15, 2013 10:37 am
by snortypig
ziggy wrote:All I can say is that all the Stockport rejects we signed are are what they are - rejects. But also rejects from a fellow relegated club. A quick read of their website at the time showed exactly what they the fans thought of them. How we had the misjudgement to sign them up I will never know (desperation maybe?) and it ultimately paid a large part in our downfall.
Agreed.
Panic signings.
Re: Danny Lazy Rowe
Posted: Wed May 15, 2013 11:03 am
by saltcellar
snortypig wrote:ziggy wrote:All I can say is that all the Stockport rejects we signed are are what they are - rejects. But also rejects from a fellow relegated club. A quick read of their website at the time showed exactly what they the fans thought of them. How we had the misjudgement to sign them up I will never know (desperation maybe?) and it ultimately paid a large part in our downfall.
Agreed.
Panic signings.
Disagree.
Sean McConville, Danny Martin Rowe and Danny O'Donnell all came to the club with good pedigree's.
McConville was a big disappointment, the other two were not when they were on the pitch playing football.
Unfortunately Dnny M pick up injuries when he was in good form and O'Donnell got injuries in his first two matches (ironically colliding with his own teammates) and we never saw the best of him.
Danny Lucas Rowe never came to the club from Stockport, he was a Fleetwood player not a Stockport reject.
I never rated the guy, but when we played Mansfield and was talking at halftime to one of their supportersin his 60's, he said DLR was the only player he would take from our club.
No, he did not have a white stick.
I don't think any were panic buy's, some just never lived up to their reputation, injuries prevented others living up to theirs.
Re: Danny Lazy Rowe
Posted: Wed May 15, 2013 11:39 am
by barrowfan
saltcellar wrote:
I don't think any were panic buy's, some just never lived up to their reputation, injuries prevented others living up to theirs.
Other influences could have affected the ones who weren't injured and not fulfilling their potential, such as the manager.

Re: Danny Lazy Rowe
Posted: Wed May 15, 2013 11:46 am
by audigex
barrowfan wrote:saltcellar wrote:
I don't think any were panic buy's, some just never lived up to their reputation, injuries prevented others living up to theirs.
Other influences could have affected the ones who weren't injured and not fulfilling their potential, such as the manager.

The only one who wasn't injured and didn't live up to his reputation was DL Rowe, as far as I can tell - and his laziness was there for all to see.
Re: Danny Lazy Rowe
Posted: Wed May 15, 2013 12:05 pm
by spirit of 1990
saltcellar wrote:Sean McConville, Danny Martin Rowe and Danny O'Donnell all came to the club with good pedigree's.
McConville did???
Not too sure about that, Stockport supporters hated him long before he came to us, plus his career was plumeting last summer as he touted himself around various clubs.
Horrible, horrible person. & a [SwearFilter] shit footballer.
Re: Danny Lazy Rowe
Posted: Wed May 15, 2013 12:10 pm
by corner 91
spirit of 1990 wrote:
Horrible, horrible person. & a [SwearFilter] shit footballer.
Couldn't agree more!
Re: Danny Lazy Rowe
Posted: Wed May 15, 2013 12:12 pm
by Van Der Nipper
spirit of 1990 wrote:saltcellar wrote:Sean McConville, Danny Martin Rowe and Danny O'Donnell all came to the club with good pedigree's.
McConville did???
Not too sure about that, Stockport supporters hated him long before he came to us, plus his career was plumeting last summer as he touted himself around various clubs.
Horrible, horrible person. & a [SwearFilter] [SwearFilter] footballer.
He did Iain,i think he had a excellent season at Accrington and was looking at a move up the leagues but Stockport came calling with money and it's been downhill ever since.
Re: Danny Lazy Rowe
Posted: Wed May 15, 2013 12:43 pm
by Steeley
corner 91 wrote:spirit of 1990 wrote:
Horrible, horrible person. & a [SwearFilter] shit footballer.
Couldn't agree more!
Sorry why is McConville a horrible person?
Re: Danny Lazy Rowe
Posted: Wed May 15, 2013 1:13 pm
by leechy38
Re: Danny Lazy Rowe
Posted: Wed May 15, 2013 1:22 pm
by Ste Story
Re: Danny Lazy Rowe
Posted: Wed May 15, 2013 1:26 pm
by audigex
Steeley wrote:corner 91 wrote:
Couldn't agree more!
Sorry why is McConville a horrible person?
I think his post was in two parts, one asking about McConville, the other commenting on DLR
Re: Danny Lazy Rowe
Posted: Wed May 15, 2013 8:13 pm
by Holkerbird
barrowfan wrote:saltcellar wrote:
I don't think any were panic buy's, some just never lived up to their reputation, injuries prevented others living up to theirs.
Other influences could have affected the ones who weren't injured and not fulfilling their potential, such as the manager.

Good God, do you ever let up? I think we know your views on Bayliss now, you don't need to bring it up on almost every thread.
You certainly have an axe to grind.
Re: Danny Lazy Rowe
Posted: Wed May 15, 2013 8:16 pm
by Holkerbird
Steeley wrote:corner 91 wrote:
Couldn't agree more!
Sorry why is McConville a horrible person?
Read your P.M.
Re: Danny Lazy Rowe
Posted: Wed May 15, 2013 9:44 pm
by thegaffer77
Need to forget about this loser now. He was here for a very short time, had very little impact, was lazy and now gone. Good riddance.
Next topic.

Re: Danny Lazy Rowe
Posted: Wed May 15, 2013 10:14 pm
by spirit of 1990
thegaffer77 wrote:had very little impact,
I think you gave him too much credit there!!!