Page 3 of 3
Re: Ground move consideration
Posted: Wed Oct 30, 2024 2:32 pm
by FanzoneFan
Wintergreen wrote: ↑Wed Oct 30, 2024 8:41 am
I think part of the NHS plan was to evict/relocate Furness Rovers and build a Portacabin city to accommodate both construction and AFC requirements temporarily. It was said that ASDA owned the land and were on-board with the proposals at the time.
On that point I wonder how long Furness Rovers lease on the training pitch has to run.
Re: Ground move consideration
Posted: Wed Oct 30, 2024 3:14 pm
by Riseley
If it was me I would just get rid of the crossbar, I was quite impressed by the stand behind the goal at Bromley at the weekend... something like that would be ideal with hospitality also
Re: Ground move consideration
Posted: Thu Oct 31, 2024 7:54 am
by Desmond2-2
behind the goals wrote: ↑Tue Oct 29, 2024 4:55 pm
Just stick with what we have ground Capacity is sufficient for gates we get let's worry about it when we reach the Championship.
Totally agree.
Re: Ground move consideration
Posted: Thu Oct 31, 2024 10:47 am
by Wintergreen
Desmond2-2 wrote: ↑Thu Oct 31, 2024 7:54 am
behind the goals wrote: ↑Tue Oct 29, 2024 4:55 pm
Just stick with what we have ground Capacity is sufficient for gates we get let's worry about it when we reach the Championship.
Totally agree.
Well obviously we are going nowhere but the thread is about future proposals that may be taking place with stakeholders being the government, BAE, the council and potentially Barrow RL and AFC.
https://www.nwemail.co.uk/news/24653670 ... -well-bae/
Re: Ground move consideration
Posted: Fri Nov 01, 2024 3:10 pm
by barrowaberdeen
We don't need groundshare we need at least 2 full size 4G pitches. We need further development of existing facilities in at least four areas of town.
Then there's more use of the small 5 a side community pitches the FA are rolling out. And to sort out Pulse, which is in disgraceful condition.
Then the problem of training and finding enough coaches.
And that's before we tackle access to these, through transport, through funding, through a coherent strategy to change the face of sports provision in Barrow. Partly so that children in poverty don't have to pay to play sport, a state of affairs which is holding back many.
Until all that's done, a massive no from me.
Re: Ground move consideration
Posted: Fri Nov 01, 2024 4:35 pm
by FanzoneFan
barrowaberdeen wrote: ↑Fri Nov 01, 2024 3:10 pm
We don't need groundshare we need at least 2 full size 4G pitches. We need further development of existing facilities in at least four areas of town.
Then there's more use of the small 5 a side community pitches the FA are rolling out. And to sort out Pulse, which is in disgraceful condition.
Then the problem of training and finding enough coaches.
And that's before we tackle access to these, through transport, through funding, through a coherent strategy to change the face of sports provision in Barrow. Partly so that children in poverty don't have to pay to play sport, a state of affairs which is holding back many.
Until all that's done, a massive no from me.
Forgive me but what is Pulse ?
Re: Ground move consideration
Posted: Fri Nov 01, 2024 4:36 pm
by McMark
FanzoneFan wrote: ↑Fri Nov 01, 2024 4:35 pm
barrowaberdeen wrote: ↑Fri Nov 01, 2024 3:10 pm
We don't need groundshare we need at least 2 full size 4G pitches. We need further development of existing facilities in at least four areas of town.
Then there's more use of the small 5 a side community pitches the FA are rolling out. And to sort out Pulse, which is in disgraceful condition.
Then the problem of training and finding enough coaches.
And that's before we tackle access to these, through transport, through funding, through a coherent strategy to change the face of sports provision in Barrow. Partly so that children in poverty don't have to pay to play sport, a state of affairs which is holding back many.
Until all that's done, a massive no from me.
Forgive me but what is Pulse ?
Pulse is or was the company that ran the Leisure facilities at the Park and they ran the football facilities into the ground. It’s now back under the council umbrella.
Re: Ground move consideration
Posted: Sat Nov 02, 2024 8:34 am
by Main Stand SeasonTct
barrowaberdeen wrote: ↑Fri Nov 01, 2024 3:10 pm
We don't need groundshare we need at least 2 full size 4G pitches. We need further development of existing facilities in at least four areas of town.
Then there's more use of the small 5 a side community pitches the FA are rolling out. And to sort out Pulse, which is in disgraceful condition.
Then the problem of training and finding enough coaches.
And that's before we tackle access to these, through transport, through funding, through a coherent strategy to change the face of sports provision in Barrow. Partly so that children in poverty don't have to pay to play sport, a state of affairs which is holding back many.
Until all that's done, a massive no from me.
I can't disagree with any of that. It's an utter disgrace that Barrow does not have at least one full size 4G Pitch. The town did once have a Barrovian working in a paid capacity representing the area for the FA but for the life of me I can think of a single benefit he brought to Barrow regarding football.
Re: Ground move consideration
Posted: Sun Nov 03, 2024 1:10 pm
by capman
I can not think off one good thing the labour party has done for sport in Barrow
Re: Ground move consideration
Posted: Sun Nov 03, 2024 2:21 pm
by McMark
Main Stand SeasonTct wrote: ↑Sat Nov 02, 2024 8:34 am
barrowaberdeen wrote: ↑Fri Nov 01, 2024 3:10 pm
We don't need groundshare we need at least 2 full size 4G pitches. We need further development of existing facilities in at least four areas of town.
Then there's more use of the small 5 a side community pitches the FA are rolling out. And to sort out Pulse, which is in disgraceful condition.
Then the problem of training and finding enough coaches.
And that's before we tackle access to these, through transport, through funding, through a coherent strategy to change the face of sports provision in Barrow. Partly so that children in poverty don't have to pay to play sport, a state of affairs which is holding back many.
Until all that's done, a massive no from me.
I can't disagree with any of that. It's an utter disgrace that Barrow does not have at least one full size 4G Pitch. The town did once have a Barrovian working in a paid capacity representing the area for the FA but for the life of me I can think of a single benefit he brought to Barrow regarding football.
Come of it if your having a swipe at TC, he worked as a coach for Lancashire FA bringing something to do for many youngsters in the area especially during the school holidays way before we had anything else in the area to improve the local kids on the football front especially those that weren’t privileged enough to be taken on by football league clubs. Some even got the opportunity to progress by being part of these coaching sessions. The kids loved their time there, with some going on to coach in the youth set up at Barrow too.
If I remember correctly Inside Out later emerged through The Doc and other such ventures followed.