Re: BAFC updates
Posted: Sat Feb 13, 2016 7:17 pm
Getting hit by a ball is a poor excuse, anyone in ground could get hit by a ball.
and then get laughed at by youboyliegladbach wrote:Getting hit by a ball is a poor excuse, anyone in ground could get hit by a ball.
I think the concern was that a ballboy might get hit by a ball/player and then get knocked into the wall.boyliegladbach wrote:Getting hit by a ball is a poor excuse, anyone in ground could get hit by a ball.
Jonty, the cost of that tower cost an enormous amount of money, from memory it was upward of £200.000. It did of course include mobile control equipment, but never the less very expensive the foundations were immense, probably more than the originals but things have changed.Jonty wrote:Re floodlights, Does anyone know who fabricated the newer one it. It's under 10 years old. If the older pylons are not worth saving and he wants to keep a traditional look to the ground then surely the solution is three more of these.
Absolutely will cost an enormous amount of money and I'm sure the foundations are immense, but I'm only going on the vision he has for the ground and what he himself has said he wants.In the past he has been very clear about his vision of a new "traditional" ground- including floodlights- in here:optomisticsupporter wrote:Jonty, the cost of that tower cost an enormous amount of money, from memory it was upward of £200.000. It did of course include mobile control equipment, but never the less very expensive the foundations were immense, probably more than the originals but things have changed.Jonty wrote:Re floodlights, Does anyone know who fabricated the newer one it. It's under 10 years old. If the older pylons are not worth saving and he wants to keep a traditional look to the ground then surely the solution is three more of these.
A lot of things have been said! at the end of the day economics will decie what happens,i don`t believe it`s viable to keep the lights as they are now,people should move on things have changed since 1964(think that`s when they were installed).let`s not drown in nostalgia .Jonty wrote:Absolutely will cost an enormous amount of money and I'm sure the foundations are immense, but I'm only going on the vision he has for the ground and what he himself has said he wants.In the past he has been very clear about his vision of a new "traditional" ground- including floodlights- in here:optomisticsupporter wrote: Jonty, the cost of that tower cost an enormous amount of money, from memory it was upward of £200.000. It did of course include mobile control equipment, but never the less very expensive the foundations were immense, probably more than the originals but things have changed.
http://www.nwemail.co.uk/Casson-and-arc ... a2bb122-ds
Respect what you're saying there, but at the end of the day it's his money and his decision to determine if he wants to pursue his nostalgic vision. We can only go off what he's said and a key part of that is to retain the floodlights as an iconic feature. Personally I am very happy we have an owner who is prepared to do this.blue nige wrote:A lot of things have been said! at the end of the day economics will decie what happens,i don`t believe it`s viable to keep the lights as they are now,people should move on things have changed since 1964(think that`s when they were installed).let`s not drown in nostalgia .Jonty wrote: Absolutely will cost an enormous amount of money and I'm sure the foundations are immense, but I'm only going on the vision he has for the ground and what he himself has said he wants.In the past he has been very clear about his vision of a new "traditional" ground- including floodlights- in here:
http://www.nwemail.co.uk/Casson-and-arc ... a2bb122-ds
Yes, we will be finalising this shortly & ordering more than last year when most of the stock was used up on staff, squad & stewards.Mark Mc wrote:Thank's for the update Ian, a great idea by the way!
Could you ask about the clubs merchandise for next season is there plans for Polo shirts and the likes, on sale before the season starts.
It is necessary to build in as many permutations of colours as possible, red has served us well as a compromise when neither white or blue was acceptable, we considered stripes, yellow, green etc, etc and eventually returned to red with black trim. The new sponsor has amended their logo in order to complement the colours of the kit.Bigfathoss wrote:Can you ask what in cowp's name possessed somebody to authorise a red kit? It should never happen, no excuse!