Barrow AFC.net

Home isn't too bad but the aways a bit shite.

Both look OK to me.

Home is good. Away is a bit dodgy, reminds me of something from the Mark Dobie era.

Looks cheap and shit. Very disappointed.

Does the job.

Home is shite and looks like last seasons. Really liked last seasons Blue one so these two look very dissapointing.

Ste Story wrote: ↑Sat Jun 16, 2018 4:18 pm Looks cheap and shit. Very disappointed.

+1 Horrible

Bit plain but not the worst kit I’ve seen - haven’t seen close up or quality
I liked the burgundy one from last season

Bought the blue one and burgundy last season will not be buying any of these! Should have gone with Macron why do we have to go with yet another non footballing kit maker?

It’s a football shirt ffs, not a fashion accessory.

BLK are usually quite a good brand, Hartlepool’s home & away were decent last season which is why this very unimaginative design is confusing, it’s like we’ve purposely asked for this particular design as the home shirt is very similar to last season.

It's a shirt. If you don't like it don't buy it. More concerned about how the people wearing it play.

Dalton Bluebird wrote: ↑Sat Jun 16, 2018 5:58 pm It’s a football shirt ffs, not a fashion accessory.

What a stupid statement. When you're hoping to sell them to fans who will wear them on holiday, to the gym, to college etc, it has to be somewhat of a fashion accessory. Otherwise why bother bringing new ones out each year?

These look cheap and boring. Why bother getting bespoke if they're going to look so plain, might as well get an off the shelf nike or addidas one or sommat.

Both look alright to me. I’ve had plenty of BLK tops in the past, always been decent quality.

Can’t really tell from the pics, are the sponsors printed or dye-sublimated?

jimcook wrote: ↑Sat Jun 16, 2018 7:45 pm Both look alright to me. I’ve had plenty of BLK tops in the past, always been decent quality.

Can’t really tell from the pics, are the sponsors printed or dye-sublimated?

Sort the trains out Jim.