What exactly are you basing Obi's inclusion on, particularly in that role?? Seems a rather bizarre suggestion to me.Jonty wrote:I'd ditch the wingers for a start. This will stop us playing it across the park and forcing us to be more direct- get it forward as quick as we can. Everything going through Obi or Baker in a free role behind the front two. I also think we'd also win more free kicks in advanced positions playing this way.
--------------------Pearson---------------------
Flynn-------Hessey----Anderson------Skelton-
----------Hunter---Owen--Harvey--------
---------------------Anouro (or Baker)----------------
----------------Boyes--Almond-- (or Jackson)----------
FAO Dave Bayliss
Re: FAO Dave Bayliss
-
HenneysKnee
- BarrowAFC Veteran
- Posts: 8354
- Joined: Wed Jun 29, 2011 10:28 pm
- Contact:
Re: FAO Dave Bayliss
So basically everyone wants Hessey at centre back, apart from that a lot of different teams
-
mickycarrol
- Silver Member
- Posts: 1399
- Joined: Wed May 28, 2008 7:45 pm
- Contact:
Re: FAO Dave Bayliss
Also hunter is suspended is he not??Kieran wrote:What exactly are you basing Obi's inclusion on, particularly in that role?? Seems a rather bizarre suggestion to me.Jonty wrote:I'd ditch the wingers for a start. This will stop us playing it across the park and forcing us to be more direct- get it forward as quick as we can. Everything going through Obi or Baker in a free role behind the front two. I also think we'd also win more free kicks in advanced positions playing this way.
--------------------Pearson---------------------
Flynn-------Hessey----Anderson------Skelton-
----------Hunter---Owen--Harvey--------
---------------------Anouro (or Baker)----------------
----------------Boyes--Almond-- (or Jackson)----------
"The trouble with referees is that they know the rules, but they dont know the game"
Bill Shankly
Bill Shankly
Re: FAO Dave Bayliss
Because he was the first player Bayliss brought in and based on his pre season games, he looked a tricky, busy player who could cause problems and win free kicks in dangerous areas. What's bizarre about that? or do we keep flogging the 442 that isn't working? We can't keep doing the same things over and over again and expecting different results.Kieran wrote:What exactly are you basing Obi's inclusion on, particularly in that role?? Seems a rather bizarre suggestion to me.Jonty wrote:I'd ditch the wingers for a start. This will stop us playing it across the park and forcing us to be more direct- get it forward as quick as we can. Everything going through Obi or Baker in a free role behind the front two. I also think we'd also win more free kicks in advanced positions playing this way.
--------------------Pearson---------------------
Flynn-------Hessey----Anderson------Skelton-
----------Hunter---Owen--Harvey--------
---------------------Anouro (or Baker)----------------
----------------Boyes--Almond-- (or Jackson)----------
Still searching for the Young Soul Rebels
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5mYxZUJt4xc
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5mYxZUJt4xc
Re: FAO Dave Bayliss
Yeah- for one game- This is the line up i'd like to see for a run of games.mickycarrol wrote:Also hunter is suspended is he not??Kieran wrote: What exactly are you basing Obi's inclusion on, particularly in that role?? Seems a rather bizarre suggestion to me.
Still searching for the Young Soul Rebels
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5mYxZUJt4xc
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5mYxZUJt4xc
-
HenneysKnee
- BarrowAFC Veteran
- Posts: 8354
- Joined: Wed Jun 29, 2011 10:28 pm
- Contact:
Re: FAO Dave Bayliss
We haven't been playing 4-4-2......
Re: FAO Dave Bayliss
footballs all about opinions. What would be your preferred line up to try and change our fortunes? I think our wing play has been innefective and we've been a bit light in the centre.Kieran wrote:What exactly are you basing Obi's inclusion on, particularly in that role?? Seems a rather bizarre suggestion to me.Jonty wrote:I'd ditch the wingers for a start. This will stop us playing it across the park and forcing us to be more direct- get it forward as quick as we can. Everything going through Obi or Baker in a free role behind the front two. I also think we'd also win more free kicks in advanced positions playing this way.
--------------------Pearson---------------------
Flynn-------Hessey----Anderson------Skelton-
----------Hunter---Owen--Harvey--------
---------------------Anouro (or Baker)----------------
----------------Boyes--Almond-- (or Jackson)----------
Still searching for the Young Soul Rebels
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5mYxZUJt4xc
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5mYxZUJt4xc
Re: FAO Dave Bayliss
HenneysKnee wrote:We haven't been playing 4-4-2......
oh yeah, thanks for pointing that out. What would be your team of choice?
Still searching for the Young Soul Rebels
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5mYxZUJt4xc
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5mYxZUJt4xc
Re: FAO Dave Bayliss
I liked Obi in pre-season, but from what I saw he's never the type of player that would suit playing in the hole just behind a front two. He's very much the type of player who would be most effective playing on the shoulder of the last defender and using his pace to cause problems.Jonty wrote: Because he was the first player Bayliss brought in and based on his pre season games, he looked a tricky, busy player who could cause problems and win free kicks in dangerous areas. What's bizarre about that? or do we keep flogging the 442 that isn't working? We can't keep doing the same things over and over again and expecting different results.
Put Almond where you've got Obi and Jackson where you've got Almond and I could see the logic in your team (though wouldn't necessarily be the side I'd pick).
Re: FAO Dave Bayliss
yep- that looks a good option. Something has to change- We are doing the same things every week and it aint working.
Still searching for the Young Soul Rebels
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5mYxZUJt4xc
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5mYxZUJt4xc
Re: FAO Dave Bayliss
If you really are Micky Carroll, DB will probably have you playing!
-
BERSATUBOY
- Bronze Member
- Posts: 823
- Joined: Wed May 28, 2008 4:44 pm
- Contact:
Re: FAO Dave Bayliss
mmmm isn't hunter suspended for 5 cards to date....and he wasnt gonna play last week cos the boss didn't want him booked 
Re: FAO Dave Bayliss
---------------Peo--------------
Flynn -- Peo -- Hessey -- Skelton
------------Harvey---------------
---Baker--Owen/Almond--Rowe
-------Boyes-----Jackson------
Flynn -- Peo -- Hessey -- Skelton
------------Harvey---------------
---Baker--Owen/Almond--Rowe
-------Boyes-----Jackson------
Education should be public not private, it should be open, accountable and answerable to all the community, pupils and parents.
http://wheeliekleenpowerwashing.webs.com/
http://wheeliekleenpowerwashing.webs.com/
Re: FAO Dave Bayliss
I'd swap Owen and Harvey around and I'd swap Baker for Almond. As much as Hessey is never an LB I just don't think I could bare Skelts playing.phil wrote:---------------Peo--------------
Flynn -- Peo -- Hessey -- Skelton
------------Harvey---------------
---Baker--Owen/Almond--Rowe
-------Boyes-----Jackson------
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: DaveP and 17 guests