Directors should go!! Not Baylis

leechy38 · Post by **leechy38** » Thu Dec 27, 2012 10:16 am

It should be the directors that go?.. They made there mine up last season were there club will be better of in the blue square north

Kieran · Post by **Kieran** » Thu Dec 27, 2012 10:39 am

Oh shut up you tedious clown!

Not saying they are perfect but none of the directors have ever said we'd be better off in Conf North.

spirit of 1990 · Post by **spirit of 1990** » Thu Dec 27, 2012 11:47 am

leechy38 wrote:It should be the directors that go?.. They made there mine up last season were there club will be better of in the blue square north

FFS, you must post under about six different names because it's the same shit all the time.

barrowaberdeen · Post by **barrowaberdeen** » Thu Dec 27, 2012 11:55 am

SaCk EvErYBody

DSBlue72 · Post by **DSBlue72** » Thu Dec 27, 2012 2:41 pm

Kieran · Post by **Kieran** » Thu Dec 27, 2012 4:24 pm

DSBlue72 wrote:
Kieran wrote:Oh shut up you tedious clown!

Not saying they are perfect but none of the directors have ever said we'd be better off in Conf North.
Yes they have my friend. Perhaps it's all one big cover up for financial mismanagement? Who knows?

If you've got something to say then freaking well get it said. These cryptic posts are beyond boring now.

prague bluebird · Post by **prague bluebird** » Thu Dec 27, 2012 4:30 pm

barrowaberdeen wrote:SaCk EvErYBody

Exactly, the way the posts are going today - sack the manager - sack the BoD - sack the fans - sack the players. What will be left? Is there a club cat we can sack???

John Very Little · Post by **John Very Little** » Thu Dec 27, 2012 4:56 pm

Can posters please refrain from personal abuse.

barrowaberdeen · Post by **barrowaberdeen** » Thu Dec 27, 2012 4:59 pm

Kieran wrote:
DSBlue72 wrote: Yes they have my friend. Perhaps it's all one big cover up for financial mismanagement? Who knows?
If you've got something to say then freaking well get it said. These cryptic posts are beyond boring now.

+ 1

Regards

Steven

PRR · Post by **PRR** » Thu Dec 27, 2012 5:13 pm

If you don't like the BOD then simply vote against whoever is up for re-election at the AGM. We are a members club and it's your right. Who is up for election / re-election BTW? Are there any new faces??

Reg · Post by **Reg** » Thu Dec 27, 2012 5:35 pm

Why was my post deleted?

This bellend comes on here trying to be a smart arse in his slimy, smug, self contented manner.

He deserves a bit of abuse.

Never liked the bloke. Never will!

Cock!

Roadrunner · Post by **Roadrunner** » Thu Dec 27, 2012 9:58 pm

PRR wrote:If you don't like the BOD then simply vote against whoever is up for re-election at the AGM. We are a members club and it's your right. Who is up for election / re-election BTW? Are there any new faces??

Like a lot of contributors on here, he is likely not a member so won't be at the AGM

Zak · Post by **Zak** » Fri Dec 28, 2012 3:17 am

John Very Little wrote:Can posters please refrain from personal abuse.

Did not see the abuse but +1.

BERSATUBOY · Post by **BERSATUBOY** » Fri Dec 28, 2012 3:54 pm

Regarding on comments being made by Directors for us being in a lower league. I am one of those who are still waiting for THAT guilty director to come out, be a man and admit he was wrong in saying that we would be better off at the lower league. Regardless of how he said it, it means he don't want to be in BSP. OK then we {searfilter} don't need him on the Directors landing. We will end up being in the same league as Holker Old Boys. No offence to the Rakesmoor Lane outfit.

The Tomahawk Kid · Post by **The Tomahawk Kid** » Fri Dec 28, 2012 4:22 pm

BERSATUBOY wrote:Regarding on comments being made by Directors for us being in a lower league. I am one of those who are still waiting for THAT guilty director to come out, be a man and admit he was wrong in saying that we would be better off at the lower league. Regardless of how he said it, it means he don't want to be in BSP. OK then we {searfilter} don't need him on the Directors landing. We will end up being in the same league as Holker Old Boys. No offence to the Rakesmoor Lane outfit.

I think I'm correct in saying it was Tony Keen - in the NWEM. When asked about the comments - didn't he say that he 'alluded' to us being better off in the Conference North?

Directors should go!! Not Baylis

Directors should go!! Not Baylis

Re: Directors should go!! Not Baylis

Re: Directors should go!! Not Baylis

Re: Directors should go!! Not Baylis

Re: Directors should go!! Not Baylis

Re: Directors should go!! Not Baylis

Re: Directors should go!! Not Baylis

Re: Directors should go!! Not Baylis

Re: Directors should go!! Not Baylis

Re: Directors should go!! Not Baylis

Re: Directors should go!! Not Baylis

Re: Directors should go!! Not Baylis

Re: Directors should go!! Not Baylis

Re: Directors should go!! Not Baylis

Re: Directors should go!! Not Baylis

Who is online