Kidderminster match thread

For all things Barrow AFC. Keep discussions civil and fair, we're all Barrow aren't we!
Post Reply
User avatar
Manchester Branch
Silver Member
Posts: 1447
Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 4:28 pm
Contact:

Re: Kidderminster match thread

Post by Manchester Branch » Sat Sep 26, 2015 8:16 pm

themaster wrote:
tictactoe wrote:

At the end if the day you either score a penalty or the keeper saves it, the keeper saved two today so well done to him.
Or you could miss the target
Or you could hit the post. Or the bar. So there's only a 1 in 5 chance of scoring. Give Cook and Grimes a break.
Quomodo es? An bene? Quid scis?

dogrider
Member
Posts: 76
Joined: Sat May 05, 2012 6:15 am
Contact:

Re: Kidderminster match thread

Post by dogrider » Sat Sep 26, 2015 8:21 pm

Cant believe how much people don't rate symington if he had play as many game as van the man I'm sure people would change their minds

Bingo
Platinum Member
Posts: 4100
Joined: Fri Jun 06, 2008 12:43 am
Location: Failsworth, Manchester
Contact:

Re: Kidderminster match thread

Post by Bingo » Sat Sep 26, 2015 8:24 pm

Dreadful first half much better second - thought there goal was off side

Penalties rubbish

Lines women had a nightmare ( I thought ) clueless

We should have won

Edmo wants the fans in but people will put up with rubbish football if your top of the league and winning they won't if your mid table -

Middleton Nick
Platinum Member
Posts: 3548
Joined: Tue Apr 14, 2015 11:32 am
Location: Middleton LA6 Remote
Contact:

Re: Kidderminster match thread

Post by Middleton Nick » Sat Sep 26, 2015 8:30 pm

Onside easily Charlie.Played on by Ashton but that wasn't his fault.He was in position LB.Symington RB somewhere upfield

User avatar
Steeley
BarrowAFC Veteran
Posts: 5750
Joined: Wed May 28, 2008 4:27 pm
Location: Manchester
Contact:

Re: Kidderminster match thread

Post by Steeley » Sat Sep 26, 2015 8:34 pm

Manchester Branch wrote:
themaster wrote: Or you could miss the target
Or you could hit the post. Or the bar. So there's only a 1 in 5 chance of scoring. Give Cook and Grimes a break.
Or you could miss the ball, 1 in 6.
Bish=God

Lancaster Branch
BarrowAFC Veteran
Posts: 5509
Joined: Sun Jun 15, 2008 10:15 pm
Contact:

Re: Kidderminster match thread

Post by Lancaster Branch » Sat Sep 26, 2015 8:42 pm

Or you could do a stumble/kick combo. 1 in 7.

http://youtu.be/altzU3kU3Lo

boyliegladbach
BarrowAFC Veteran
Posts: 8720
Joined: Sun Aug 01, 2010 10:07 am
Location: Tel aviv
Contact:

Re: Kidderminster match thread

Post by boyliegladbach » Sat Sep 26, 2015 8:48 pm

Lancaster Branch wrote:Or you could do a stumble/kick combo. 1 in 7.

http://youtu.be/altzU3kU3Lo
Or a Henry -pires
1-8

Where is Zak ? He will know

boyliegladbach
BarrowAFC Veteran
Posts: 8720
Joined: Sun Aug 01, 2010 10:07 am
Location: Tel aviv
Contact:

Re: Kidderminster match thread

Post by boyliegladbach » Sat Sep 26, 2015 8:51 pm

Bingo wrote:
Lines women had a nightmare ( I thought ) clueless

-
I agree Charlie
Another reason women should not be involved in football

She should Stick to knitting

corner 91
Veteran Member
Posts: 536
Joined: Wed May 28, 2008 6:38 pm
Location: Costa Del Walney
Contact:

Re: Kidderminster match thread

Post by corner 91 » Sat Sep 26, 2015 8:51 pm

boyliegladbach wrote:
Lancaster Branch wrote:Or you could do a stumble/kick combo. 1 in 7.

http://youtu.be/altzU3kU3Lo
Or a Henry -pires
1-8

Where is Zak ? He will know
https://youtube.com/watch?v=fa4fTMWErWk
Is this covered in the post scenario?

User avatar
Manchester Branch
Silver Member
Posts: 1447
Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 4:28 pm
Contact:

Re: Kidderminster match thread

Post by Manchester Branch » Sat Sep 26, 2015 8:59 pm

Lancaster Branch wrote:Or you could do a stumble/kick combo. 1 in 7.

http://youtu.be/altzU3kU3Lo
Classic fake injury move there at the end
Quomodo es? An bene? Quid scis?

GTBLUE
BarrowAFC Veteran
Posts: 5238
Joined: Wed May 28, 2008 5:27 pm
Location: WHEN WE HAD A ROOF
Contact:

Re: Kidderminster match thread

Post by GTBLUE » Sat Sep 26, 2015 9:05 pm

John Very Little wrote:For those clowns that were booing the substitution of Walker for Wilson it actually sounded like they were booing Walker for having a bad game - is that what they wanted it to sound like because at the Holker end that was what it did sound like!!! It seemed as though Walker put his head down when he was leaving the pitch as though the booing could have been aimed at him.
Regarding the substitution I could see why Wilson was brought on for Walker because he is bigger and more physical to deal with their defenders and did win the pen for us. I agree there were others on the pitch that were terrible and should have been taken off before then but booing an unrelated substitution sends the wrong messages.

The main issue for us today was the midfield which was atrocious. We have no idea about going forward to the point we don't seem to know what to do when we have the ball? The centre-mid pairing of Lacey & Cowps didn't work because neither of them are ball players and we looked more decisive when ARH came on to provide a better balance and make the telling passes. Haworth & VDB were awful (again) and I really don't know why Newby isn't even given a proper chance instead of them?
Symington was better than usual at full back but that isn't saying a lot is it and was one of those at fault for their breakaway goal - he certainly wasn't MOTM (Mike Wilson stop winding people up). I agree with Ashton being given the MOTM award.
What right do you have to call people clowns for booing. Do you know why 1,000 fans or so we're doing it, no you don't. Read this forum, they were booing the idiot manager who is absolutely clueless. Out of his depth, brought no quality in, apart from the two full backs and the keeper it's last season's team.

boyliegladbach
BarrowAFC Veteran
Posts: 8720
Joined: Sun Aug 01, 2010 10:07 am
Location: Tel aviv
Contact:

Re: Kidderminster match thread

Post by boyliegladbach » Sat Sep 26, 2015 9:10 pm

GTBLUE wrote:
John Very Little wrote:For those clowns that were booing the substitution of Walker for Wilson it actually sounded like they were booing Walker for having a bad game - is that what they wanted it to sound like because at the Holker end that was what it did sound like!!! It seemed as though Walker put his head down when he was leaving the pitch as though the booing could have been aimed at him.
Regarding the substitution I could see why Wilson was brought on for Walker because he is bigger and more physical to deal with their defenders and did win the pen for us. I agree there were others on the pitch that were terrible and should have been taken off before then but booing an unrelated substitution sends the wrong messages.

The main issue for us today was the midfield which was atrocious. We have no idea about going forward to the point we don't seem to know what to do when we have the ball? The centre-mid pairing of Lacey & Cowps didn't work because neither of them are ball players and we looked more decisive when ARH came on to provide a better balance and make the telling passes. Haworth & VDB were awful (again) and I really don't know why Newby isn't even given a proper chance instead of them?
Symington was better than usual at full back but that isn't saying a lot is it and was one of those at fault for their breakaway goal - he certainly wasn't MOTM (Mike Wilson stop winding people up). I agree with Ashton being given the MOTM award.
What right do you have to call people clowns for booing. Do you know why 1,000 fans or so we're doing it, no you don't. Read this forum, they were booing the idiot manager who is absolutely clueless. Out of his depth, brought no quality in, apart from the two full backs and the keeper it's last season's team.
1000???
Really
I would have said about 20

whitty1969
Platinum Member
Posts: 2937
Joined: Sun Apr 21, 2013 9:47 pm
Contact:

Re: Kidderminster match thread

Post by whitty1969 » Sat Sep 26, 2015 9:13 pm

I would say a few hundred. Edmo got lots of stick and rightly so.

saltcellar
Platinum Member
Posts: 2839
Joined: Mon Jun 22, 2009 7:44 pm
Contact:

Re: Kidderminster match thread

Post by saltcellar » Sat Sep 26, 2015 9:19 pm

Graythwaite Nick wrote:Onside easily Charlie.Played on by Ashton but that wasn't his fault.He was in position LB.Symington RB somewhere upfield
Agreed he was onside.
Not because Ashton was playing him onside but because the Kidderminster player was in his own half when the ball was played.
Symington had gone to were the corner was being taken from, presumably to take it but was then sent away by Haworth who took the kick.
Symington was then out of position and not enough Barrow players were back to cover the breakaway leaving a one on one situation.

Pedro
Platinum Member
Posts: 3489
Joined: Wed May 06, 2015 11:23 pm

Re: Kidderminster match thread

Post by Pedro » Sat Sep 26, 2015 9:24 pm

Really need a change in management team.
Last year Fylde gifted us the league.
We struggled to beat the likes of Hyde last year got knocked out of the cups by lesser teams.
We gifted Halifax their first win and today could not beat the bottom side even missing two penalty's
Lack of quality and even less Management ability.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Cubbins Paratrooper and 19 guests