Have to agree. From the radio commentary I was expecting to see the lad pushed to the ground 2-handed by Anderton. Not a bit of it.Middleton Nick wrote:Still struggling to see a penalty there.
Barrow v Matlock (match thread)
- Nigel Bamford
- Platinum Member
- Posts: 2700
- Joined: Wed May 28, 2008 5:09 pm
- Location: Between here and gone
- Contact:
Re: Barrow v Matlock (match thread)
It all comes 'round again.
- The Real Slim Azza
- BarrowAFC Veteran
- Posts: 6941
- Joined: Thu Jan 01, 2009 2:07 pm
- Contact:
Re: Barrow v Matlock (match thread)
Jim wrote:Are you saying that if these promises (if that's what they were) had not been made, you would not have voted for a takeover? What was the alternative?The Real Slim a former member of this forum wrote:Its easy saying that Jim.
Promises were made to fans in order to gain the votes for control of the club and they simply have been forgotten about.
Im not saying it would have changed the outcome.
All Im saying is there was no real need to promise x,y and z in order to convince fans to vote in favour. Especially when there was no plan in place to implement them.
Some fans forget , I don't
Taurus excreta cerebrum vincit
BIG BADGE MISTAKE POLOS
END OF POST
BIG BADGE MISTAKE POLOS
END OF POST
-
Bingo
- Platinum Member
- Posts: 4103
- Joined: Fri Jun 06, 2008 12:43 am
- Location: Failsworth, Manchester
- Contact:
Re: Barrow v Matlock (match thread)
Floodlights very poor - is there an update about when these are sorted -
Our next home game sees us on BT sport - they won't be back for any night game anytime soon
Our next home game sees us on BT sport - they won't be back for any night game anytime soon
- spirit of 1990
- BarrowAFC Veteran
- Posts: 9898
- Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2010 10:50 am
- Contact:
Re: Barrow v Matlock (match thread)
Very dodgy penalty decision....if that had been awarded to us I would've thought we were bloody lucky to get it.
If there is a person in that dressing room who can pull the team back together and set us off on another run it'll be Danny, I thought it showed just why he's captain after he scored his goal and he dragged everyone around to celebrate.
If there is a person in that dressing room who can pull the team back together and set us off on another run it'll be Danny, I thought it showed just why he's captain after he scored his goal and he dragged everyone around to celebrate.
We didn't underestimate them, we just didn't think they were that good.
Re: Barrow v Matlock (match thread)
no penalty. just a cheat cheatingNigel Bamford wrote:Have to agree. From the radio commentary I was expecting to see the lad pushed to the ground 2-handed by Anderton. Not a bit of it.Middleton Nick wrote:Still struggling to see a penalty there.
Re: Barrow v Matlock (match thread)
Anyone know when the draw for the next round is?
how we get there i don,t no.Barrows on the way
Re: Barrow v Matlock (match thread)
Can be viewed via periscope at 10:30 tomorrow;
http://www.thefa.com/news/2017/jan/13/f ... ive-130117
http://www.thefa.com/news/2017/jan/13/f ... ive-130117
Re: Barrow v Matlock (match thread)
Cheers mark mcMark Mc wrote:Can be viewed via periscope at 10:30 tomorrow;
http://www.thefa.com/news/2017/jan/13/f ... ive-130117
how we get there i don,t no.Barrows on the way
Re: Barrow v Matlock (match thread)
So you keep saying.. why not have another meeting with Mr Casson or your friend Austin..tell them what you think again face to face..or get a pie van on Holker streetThe Real Slim a former member of this forum wrote:Its easy saying that Jim.
Promises were made to fans in order to gain the votes for control of the club and they simply have been forgotten about.
It should be extremely worrying to fans the amount of money being spent based on the hope the club may one day get promoted. The club cannot forever live off cash injections without meeting some sort of trouble.
- Steeley
- BarrowAFC Veteran
- Posts: 5750
- Joined: Wed May 28, 2008 4:27 pm
- Location: Manchester
- Contact:
Re: Barrow v Matlock (match thread)
People keep having a pop but no one has any reasonable response.mr_grey wrote:So you keep saying.. why not have another meeting with Mr Casson or your friend Austin..tell them what you think again face to face..or get a pie van on Holker streetThe Real Slim a former member of this forum wrote:Its easy saying that Jim.
Promises were made to fans in order to gain the votes for control of the club and they simply have been forgotten about.
It should be extremely worrying to fans the amount of money being spent based on the hope the club may one day get promoted. The club cannot forever live off cash injections without meeting some sort of trouble.
What happens if/when we are still in the conference in two seasons? Still keep rattling out huge wages on people who could've signed for Dortmund to rot on the bench? Even casson will get bored of that.
Bish=God
-
blue nige
- BarrowAFC Veteran
- Posts: 7175
- Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2013 7:21 pm
- Location: Antarctica
- Contact:
Re: Barrow v Matlock (match thread)
Oh the irony you critice people for their views, but defend someone (irrespective of investment )that not once not twice but at least three times gave details of 5 year plans , fan involvement, choosing architects etc.Jim wrote:Are you saying that if these promises (if that's what they were) had not been made, you would not have voted for a takeover? What was the alternative?The Real Slim a former member of this forum wrote:Its easy saying that Jim.
Promises were made to fans in order to gain the votes for control of the club and they simply have been forgotten about.
So please don't have a go at people for pointing this out have a go at the person who divulged all these plans!
- Keith Nichols
- Member
- Posts: 120
- Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2010 9:24 pm
- Contact:
Re: Barrow v Matlock (match thread)
You mean the owner of the club big nige? Just maybe he can do things as he wishes, as you possibly do with the things you own.
As long as he produces the results on the field (which he is doing - best season for a long time), people will turn up, good players will come......
As long as he produces the results on the field (which he is doing - best season for a long time), people will turn up, good players will come......
- Nigel Bamford
- Platinum Member
- Posts: 2700
- Joined: Wed May 28, 2008 5:09 pm
- Location: Between here and gone
- Contact:
Re: Barrow v Matlock (match thread)
Of course he can do what he wants but since his takeover (which I welcome, don't get me wrong) he has built expectation that there will be major improvements to infrastructure withiin the relatively short term, e,g, developing one side of the ground each season. It's the dashing of that expectation which is causing disappointment together with, for a successful businessman like him, an organisation which at times is far from business-like.Keith Nichols wrote:You mean the owner of the club big nige? Just maybe he can do things as he wishes, as you possibly do with the things you own.
As long as he produces the results on the field (which he is doing - best season for a long time), people will turn up, good players will come......
Perhaps Mr Casson is becoming the Trump of Barrow AFC: his detractors take him literally but not seriously, his supporters take him seriously but not literally
As for your second point, the fact is people aren't turning up in the numbers hoped for - we've had plenty of discussion about that - and Coxy implied in his interview yesterday that getting good players was not as easy as, say, York who are bottom!
It all comes 'round again.
-
barrowaberdeen
- BarrowAFC Veteran
- Posts: 9035
- Joined: Wed May 28, 2008 4:54 pm
- Location: Independent Newbarns
Re: Barrow v Matlock (match thread)
I don't think PC had the first idea what he was getting into.
We would have voted for this as well
Not all is right though..all of us seem to make everything too difficult at Barrow..
But we are doing better on the park than in years
Have I missed owt?
We would have voted for this as well
Not all is right though..all of us seem to make everything too difficult at Barrow..
But we are doing better on the park than in years
Have I missed owt?
- Keith Nichols
- Member
- Posts: 120
- Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2010 9:24 pm
- Contact:
Re: Barrow v Matlock (match thread)
Good summary barrowaberdeen.
I know numerous obstacles have since appeared which has delayed progress. I'm sure Paul wants things done properly v papering over the crack by previous debt ridden boards. Not blaming them because its a hard job keeping clubs financially going. I've been there with another club It takes time to unearth the issues and the original plans sometimes need to be turned on their head to get it right, taking up more time. To us it seems like nothing is moving and feet are dragging. What was once a bullish promise has probably turned out to be a long haul in order to get things passed by local authorities, building regulations, health and safety, and bless them, our Town Hall planning. It doesn't matter how much money you have, these operations often leave things in the in-tray for months, for various reasons.
You probably noted, like I, that there is a growing possibility of moving away from Holker St and building afresh - as did Fylde, Fleetwood, etc. It can be a cheaper and faster option. But you don't take those decisions lightly. There is too much history and memories that would be thrown away.
So let's not slate the owner too much. He stepped in because of his passion for the town and club. Yes he may not have had the full picture when he made that decision to buy, or even when he revealed his expected plans. But his intention is honest. The recent unearthed problems almost certainly caused the delaying factors, and then spending time to work out which way to go - renovate or start afresh. Not his willingness to invest in the club.
In the end we will all benefit from the best solution. It's just a pity Paul didn't step in several years earlier. We would now be experiencing the benefits of his careful investment.
I know numerous obstacles have since appeared which has delayed progress. I'm sure Paul wants things done properly v papering over the crack by previous debt ridden boards. Not blaming them because its a hard job keeping clubs financially going. I've been there with another club It takes time to unearth the issues and the original plans sometimes need to be turned on their head to get it right, taking up more time. To us it seems like nothing is moving and feet are dragging. What was once a bullish promise has probably turned out to be a long haul in order to get things passed by local authorities, building regulations, health and safety, and bless them, our Town Hall planning. It doesn't matter how much money you have, these operations often leave things in the in-tray for months, for various reasons.
You probably noted, like I, that there is a growing possibility of moving away from Holker St and building afresh - as did Fylde, Fleetwood, etc. It can be a cheaper and faster option. But you don't take those decisions lightly. There is too much history and memories that would be thrown away.
So let's not slate the owner too much. He stepped in because of his passion for the town and club. Yes he may not have had the full picture when he made that decision to buy, or even when he revealed his expected plans. But his intention is honest. The recent unearthed problems almost certainly caused the delaying factors, and then spending time to work out which way to go - renovate or start afresh. Not his willingness to invest in the club.
In the end we will all benefit from the best solution. It's just a pity Paul didn't step in several years earlier. We would now be experiencing the benefits of his careful investment.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Hendoblue and 44 guests