Paul Cox Hartlepool

For all things Barrow AFC. Keep discussions civil and fair, we're all Barrow aren't we!
mickycarrol
Silver Member
Posts: 1399
Joined: Wed May 28, 2008 7:45 pm
Contact:

Re: Paul Cox Hartlepool

Post by mickycarrol » Thu May 25, 2017 10:56 pm

Bingo wrote:
mickycarrol wrote:Worrying read this thread. Puts a lot of doubt into people's heads, I doubt Casson is funding us as much as Cox wants and I doubt Cox wants to be here as a result as he will want to compete for promotion.worrying times I'm afraid
I bet our budget Is in the top 5 - imagine what some of our previous managers could do with a budget like that.
Mmmmmmmm I wouldn't be so confident in that personally.
"The trouble with referees is that they know the rules, but they dont know the game"
Bill Shankly

Bingo
Platinum Member
Posts: 4100
Joined: Fri Jun 06, 2008 12:43 am
Location: Failsworth, Manchester
Contact:

Re: Paul Cox Hartlepool

Post by Bingo » Thu May 25, 2017 11:05 pm

I was quite happy for Cox to stay BUT if he doesn't want to be at Barrow I'd rather we have a manager that wants to manage us.

EHB
Senior Member
Posts: 438
Joined: Wed May 28, 2008 4:28 pm
Contact:

Re: Paul Cox Hartlepool

Post by EHB » Thu May 25, 2017 11:08 pm

Something doesn't quite add up here.

If hartlepool asked Casson for permission then the buyout fee would have been discussed at that point. Before they even spoke to Cox. Otherwise why would they waste their time arranging a meeting, probably drafting a contract etc. They would have known the price casson wanted and would have been comfortable with that.

So that tells me, Cox didn't want to go. Either because he wanted to stay at barrow or because the money wasn't good enough.

Pedro
Platinum Member
Posts: 3489
Joined: Wed May 06, 2015 11:23 pm

Re: Paul Cox Hartlepool

Post by Pedro » Fri May 26, 2017 12:09 am

The Real Slim a former member of this forum wrote:
Ste Story wrote:
Indeed. Player layer renewed contracts, one of the best managers we've had in recenrlt memory potentially on the way out, massively scaled back plans on the ground... Ambition not matching reality?

STE! Be very careful! You can't say those things on here!
We let our best defender in Danny Livsey go.I would have to thought if we were going to push for promotion we would have kept him.
Maybe letting Paul Cox talk to clubs is another way for Casson to recoup some cash.
Think Cox reaction will reflect what Casson did or not do in the January window.

User avatar
John Very Little
Platinum Member
Posts: 4136
Joined: Sat Jun 07, 2008 3:32 am
Contact:

Re: Paul Cox Hartlepool

Post by John Very Little » Fri May 26, 2017 1:46 am

Does anyone know what the parachute payment is the first season after a team drops out of League 2 is that Hartlepool will get?
I know its a fair bit but won't come anywhere near what the likes of Tranmere and Forest Green spent, just interested?

On the point about Livesey, he was on a good wage and wanted a 2 year contract despite being 32, not a surprise we let him go really.
Shows more ambition in letting him go as there are better players than him available and he'll not get better at his age - dropping a league shows the direction he's going.

I don't think Casson wanted to go up this season as it was too soon and would leave so much to do off the field with the ground improvements that are required for League 2 standard and this is why he never spent more cash in January which probably upset Cox.
Have no issue with Cox speaking to Hartlepool to see what they're offering (anyone would do the same) but they must've known already he had 2 years left on his contract and would've had to pay a fair amount of compensation to us?

mall
Platinum Member
Posts: 2759
Joined: Sun Mar 15, 2015 2:11 pm
Contact:

Re: Paul Cox Hartlepool

Post by mall » Fri May 26, 2017 2:16 am

Anyway, looks like it has all fell through according to the evening mails Facebook pages.


Lancaster Branch
BarrowAFC Veteran
Posts: 5509
Joined: Sun Jun 15, 2008 10:15 pm
Contact:

Re: Paul Cox Hartlepool

Post by Lancaster Branch » Fri May 26, 2017 7:58 am

EHB wrote:Something doesn't quite add up here.

If hartlepool asked Casson for permission then the buyout fee would have been discussed at that point. Before they even spoke to Cox. Otherwise why would they waste their time arranging a meeting, probably drafting a contract etc. They would have known the price casson wanted and would have been comfortable with that.
Aye, that's what I can't understand either.

finbar17
Senior Member
Posts: 416
Joined: Thu May 29, 2008 2:52 pm
Contact:

Re: Paul Cox Hartlepool

Post by finbar17 » Fri May 26, 2017 8:06 am

What a life the real slim a a Ron has. Why exactly do you follow this club. Is it because you need the haters. Hahaha wimpy guy.

User avatar
The Real Slim Azza
BarrowAFC Veteran
Posts: 6941
Joined: Thu Jan 01, 2009 2:07 pm
Contact:

Re: Paul Cox Hartlepool

Post by The Real Slim Azza » Fri May 26, 2017 8:13 am

finbar17 wrote:What a life the real slim a a Ron has. Why exactly do you follow this club. Is it because you need the haters. Hahaha wimpy guy.
Are you asking questions there or just typing words in a funny order?
Taurus excreta cerebrum vincit
BIG BADGE MISTAKE POLOS
END OF POST

boyliegladbach
BarrowAFC Veteran
Posts: 8720
Joined: Sun Aug 01, 2010 10:07 am
Location: Tel aviv
Contact:

Re: Paul Cox Hartlepool

Post by boyliegladbach » Fri May 26, 2017 8:35 am

Lancaster Branch wrote:
EHB wrote:Something doesn't quite add up here.

If hartlepool asked Casson for permission then the buyout fee would have been discussed at that point. Before they even spoke to Cox. Otherwise why would they waste their time arranging a meeting, probably drafting a contract etc. They would have known the price casson wanted and would have been comfortable with that.
Aye, that's what I can't understand either.
Cox might have rejected them,

EHB
Senior Member
Posts: 438
Joined: Wed May 28, 2008 4:28 pm
Contact:

Re: Paul Cox Hartlepool

Post by EHB » Fri May 26, 2017 8:43 am

That's What I'm getting at, yet everyone on here seems to be questionning his loyalty.

If hartlepool were willing to pay 2 years of his contract out right then they knew how much money he would be on.

Maybe he needs some credit here?

User avatar
barrowfan_chris
Platinum Member
Posts: 3508
Joined: Wed May 28, 2008 5:44 pm
Location: The Former Republic of Barrovia.
Contact:

Re: Paul Cox Hartlepool

Post by barrowfan_chris » Fri May 26, 2017 8:54 am

boyliegladbach wrote:
Lancaster Branch wrote:
Aye, that's what I can't understand either.
Cox might have rejected them,

Another theory is Hartlepool might have thought Cox agreeing terms we would reduce the amount we were looking for in compensation?

boyliegladbach
BarrowAFC Veteran
Posts: 8720
Joined: Sun Aug 01, 2010 10:07 am
Location: Tel aviv
Contact:

Re: Paul Cox Hartlepool

Post by boyliegladbach » Fri May 26, 2017 9:04 am

The owner needs to make a statement.

I doubt that will happen.

User avatar
The Real Slim Azza
BarrowAFC Veteran
Posts: 6941
Joined: Thu Jan 01, 2009 2:07 pm
Contact:

Re: Paul Cox Hartlepool

Post by The Real Slim Azza » Fri May 26, 2017 9:10 am

boyliegladbach wrote:The owner needs to make a statement.

I doubt that will happen.

Exactly what should be happening. The contact between the club and its fans is non existent, there will only be one when the NWEMAIL prompts them.
Taurus excreta cerebrum vincit
BIG BADGE MISTAKE POLOS
END OF POST

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Windy Pete and 32 guests