FA Charge

For all things Barrow AFC. Keep discussions civil and fair, we're all Barrow aren't we!
SKIPPER
Platinum Member
Posts: 3719
Joined: Wed May 28, 2008 9:55 pm
Contact:

Re: FA Charge

Post by SKIPPER » Wed Feb 03, 2021 12:28 pm

Cue EM front page headline.

mickmike wilson
BarrowAFC Veteran
Posts: 5442
Joined: Thu May 29, 2008 2:56 pm
Location: The live music capital of the world, AUSTIN, TEXAS
Contact:

Re: FA Charge

Post by mickmike wilson » Wed Feb 03, 2021 12:51 pm

Bombadel wrote: ↑Tue Feb 02, 2021 7:13 pm Remember Rooney (utd version) getting a second yellow for sarcastically clapping the ref. Probably an argument for both sides, without that fire in the belly of Kay, he wouldn’t be the passionate player he is today, just needs to control it a bit.
There’s having spirit, fight (in the sporting never give up sense) & passion, Then theirs being a spoilt brat & Kay falls into the latter & it will stunt his career if he’s not careful.

We need a more controlled Kay & if no improvement Id bin him off IMHO

Moribund
Platinum Member
Posts: 2686
Joined: Sun Jan 23, 2011 1:30 pm
Contact:

Re: FA Charge

Post by Moribund » Wed Feb 03, 2021 2:41 pm

Hadrian wrote: ↑Wed Feb 03, 2021 10:21 am
Moribund wrote: ↑Tue Feb 02, 2021 10:36 pm Was it not when three or four players sprinted towards the ref screaming? Still, seems a bit much to be fined for that.
If so, it might depend what they were screaming...
Well if it was anything offensive, I'd imagine they would've been carded. Seems a bit of a mystery.

blue blue boy
Senior Member
Posts: 345
Joined: Tue Jun 10, 2008 4:29 pm
Contact:

Re: FA Charge

Post by blue blue boy » Wed Feb 03, 2021 3:46 pm

I suspect it may have something to do with the proximity of the players to the referee in these COVID affected times. As previously said, if what was said/screamed to the ref falls under offensive insulting or abusive language the it would have been :sentoff:

saltcellar
Platinum Member
Posts: 2860
Joined: Mon Jun 22, 2009 7:44 pm
Contact:

Re: FA Charge

Post by saltcellar » Wed Feb 03, 2021 6:22 pm

blue blue boy wrote: ↑Wed Feb 03, 2021 3:46 pm I suspect it may have something to do with the proximity of the players to the referee in these COVID affected times. As previously said, if what was said/screamed to the ref falls under offensive insulting or abusive language the it would have been :sentoff:
Josh Kay was given a yellow card for what he said.
Nothing shown to Scott Quigley or Jamie Devitt for their remonstration with the referee or Matty Platt who arrived on the scene later.

User avatar
spirit of 1990
BarrowAFC Veteran
Posts: 9900
Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2010 10:50 am
Contact:

Re: FA Charge

Post by spirit of 1990 » Wed Feb 03, 2021 6:33 pm

Not sure how true this is but I’ve been told whatever the incident was, it happened in the tunnel after the game had finished.
We didn't underestimate them, we just didn't think they were that good.

saltcellar
Platinum Member
Posts: 2860
Joined: Mon Jun 22, 2009 7:44 pm
Contact:

Re: FA Charge

Post by saltcellar » Wed Feb 03, 2021 7:20 pm

spirit of 1990 wrote: ↑Wed Feb 03, 2021 6:33 pm Not sure how true this is but I’ve been told whatever the incident was, it happened in the tunnel after the game had finished.
I didn't think Barrow players came out of a tunnel.
Bradford came out of one, but the Barrow player came out of a different building down a lot of steps to reach the pitch.
I would assume that would be the way they would also leave.

Bradders
Senior Member
Posts: 275
Joined: Mon Feb 17, 2020 9:29 pm
Contact:

Re: FA Charge

Post by Bradders » Wed Feb 03, 2021 11:22 pm

Let’s get a game on pleeeeease.

User avatar
Jim
BarrowAFC Veteran
Posts: 7306
Joined: Wed May 28, 2008 4:45 pm
Contact:

Re: FA Charge

Post by Jim » Thu Feb 04, 2021 9:08 am

spirit of 1990 wrote: ↑Wed Feb 03, 2021 6:33 pm Not sure how true this is but I’ve been told whatever the incident was, it happened in the tunnel after the game had finished.
Sounds much more likely. Perhaps the club could give us some more details of the charge, if only to end the speculation.

User avatar
chipmunx
Gold Member
Posts: 2290
Joined: Thu May 29, 2008 12:16 am
Location: Fortress Holker Street
Contact:

Re: FA Charge

Post by chipmunx » Thu Feb 04, 2021 9:31 am

Jim wrote: ↑Thu Feb 04, 2021 9:08 am
spirit of 1990 wrote: ↑Wed Feb 03, 2021 6:33 pm Not sure how true this is but I’ve been told whatever the incident was, it happened in the tunnel after the game had finished.
Sounds much more likely. Perhaps the club could give us some more details of the charge, if only to end the speculation.
If you read the charge doesn't it say failure to control players in the 90th minute of the game?
That means it's during game play not in the tunnel afterwards.
If you look at the match video the officials were still on the pitch talking to Jolley when the players were already going into the changing rooms.
It's pretty safe to say it was the penalty incident where Quigley complained then Hardcastle and Kay rushed in and Kay said too much and got booked, which actually occurred in the 90th minute.
Lancashire;- born and bred

saltcellar
Platinum Member
Posts: 2860
Joined: Mon Jun 22, 2009 7:44 pm
Contact:

Re: FA Charge

Post by saltcellar » Thu Feb 04, 2021 1:18 pm

chipmunx wrote: ↑Thu Feb 04, 2021 9:31 am
Jim wrote: ↑Thu Feb 04, 2021 9:08 am

Sounds much more likely. Perhaps the club could give us some more details of the charge, if only to end the speculation.
If you read the charge doesn't it say failure to control players in the 90th minute of the game?
That means it's during game play not in the tunnel afterwards.
If you look at the match video the officials were still on the pitch talking to Jolley when the players were already going into the changing rooms.
It's pretty safe to say it was the penalty incident where Quigley complained then Hardcastle and Kay rushed in and Kay said too much and got booked, which actually occurred in the 90th minute.
It wasn't Hardcastle.
He had been subbed in the 68th minute.
Quigley, Kay and Devitt were remonstrating with the referee.
Later Platt joined in.

User avatar
chipmunx
Gold Member
Posts: 2290
Joined: Thu May 29, 2008 12:16 am
Location: Fortress Holker Street
Contact:

Re: FA Charge

Post by chipmunx » Thu Feb 04, 2021 1:27 pm

saltcellar wrote: ↑Thu Feb 04, 2021 1:18 pm
chipmunx wrote: ↑Thu Feb 04, 2021 9:31 am

If you read the charge doesn't it say failure to control players in the 90th minute of the game?
That means it's during game play not in the tunnel afterwards.
If you look at the match video the officials were still on the pitch talking to Jolley when the players were already going into the changing rooms.
It's pretty safe to say it was the penalty incident where Quigley complained then Hardcastle and Kay rushed in and Kay said too much and got booked, which actually occurred in the 90th minute.
It wasn't Hardcastle.
He had been subbed in the 68th minute.
Quigley, Kay and Devitt were remonstrating with the referee.
Later Platt joined in.
yes you're right - I didn't count Platt as he came over as captain (i think) and didn't jump up and down like a spoilt kid. It was Kay who got us he charge i think.
Lancashire;- born and bred

Middleton Nick
Platinum Member
Posts: 3548
Joined: Tue Apr 14, 2015 11:32 am
Location: Middleton LA6 Remote
Contact:

Re: FA Charge

Post by Middleton Nick » Thu Feb 04, 2021 2:08 pm

There's a surprise :roll:

saltcellar
Platinum Member
Posts: 2860
Joined: Mon Jun 22, 2009 7:44 pm
Contact:

Re: FA Charge

Post by saltcellar » Thu Feb 04, 2021 3:00 pm

saltcellar wrote: ↑Tue Feb 02, 2021 6:21 pm
Time Lord wrote: ↑Tue Feb 02, 2021 6:15 pm That`s a £1000 standard penalty then for league 2 unless they deny it and are found guilty in which case it is £1500😢
The players concerned should pay it.
Maybe that way, they might have second thoughts doing it again.
Which is why I posted this earlier

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 19 guests