Scott Quigley
Re: HoB v Barrow
-
Main Stand SeasonTct
- Platinum Member
- Posts: 3120
- Joined: Sun Aug 06, 2017 5:05 pm
- Contact:
Re: HoB v Barrow
Different agent. Steve Whiston only has one player at Barrow on his books that being Connor Brownwhitty1969 wrote: ↑Thu Jul 15, 2021 9:48 am Yep, same stunt Rooney pulled last season.
All to do with Money and having your head turned by the same greedy agent the others have.
-
blue nige
- BarrowAFC Veteran
- Posts: 6958
- Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2013 7:21 pm
- Location: Antarctica
- Contact:
Re: HoB v Barrow
let's get this into prospective ALL agents have only one person they are interested in and that's themselves!Main Stand SeasonTct wrote: ↑Thu Jul 15, 2021 10:20 amDifferent agent. Steve Whiston only has one player at Barrow on his books that being Connor Brownwhitty1969 wrote: ↑Thu Jul 15, 2021 9:48 am Yep, same stunt Rooney pulled last season.
All to do with Money and having your head turned by the same greedy agent the others have.
Re: HoB v Barrow
If that is the case then why don't the club just say so? It would end the speculationmemories of 67 wrote: ↑Thu Jul 15, 2021 10:13 am I heard that Quigley's absence is due to him coming into contact with someone with COVID, meaning he has to self-isolate for 10 days.
That would explain his no show at HOB & training in Scotland.
Re: HoB v Barrow
No one from the club reads the forum. If they did we’d be the richest club in the league and never lose a game.DaveP wrote: ↑Thu Jul 15, 2021 10:28 amIf that is the case then why don't the club just say so? It would end the speculationmemories of 67 wrote: ↑Thu Jul 15, 2021 10:13 am I heard that Quigley's absence is due to him coming into contact with someone with COVID, meaning he has to self-isolate for 10 days.
That would explain his no show at HOB & training in Scotland.![]()
I wanna take you to an Away Bar
- chipmunx
- Gold Member
- Posts: 2281
- Joined: Thu May 29, 2008 12:16 am
- Location: Fortress Holker Street
- Contact:
Re: HoB v Barrow
perhaps because you private medical information is just that private. GDPR means employers can't just do that.DaveP wrote: ↑Thu Jul 15, 2021 10:28 amIf that is the case then why don't the club just say so? It would end the speculationmemories of 67 wrote: ↑Thu Jul 15, 2021 10:13 am I heard that Quigley's absence is due to him coming into contact with someone with COVID, meaning he has to self-isolate for 10 days.
That would explain his no show at HOB & training in Scotland.![]()
Lancashire;- born and bred
Re: HoB v Barrow
Because he is in isolation and under going a medical( sarcasm) imagine if he actually comes back as a Bolton player.DaveP wrote: ↑Thu Jul 15, 2021 10:28 amIf that is the case then why don't the club just say so? It would end the speculationmemories of 67 wrote: ↑Thu Jul 15, 2021 10:13 am I heard that Quigley's absence is due to him coming into contact with someone with COVID, meaning he has to self-isolate for 10 days.
That would explain his no show at HOB & training in Scotland.![]()
Last edited by Pedro on Thu Jul 15, 2021 10:45 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
whitty1969
- Platinum Member
- Posts: 2937
- Joined: Sun Apr 21, 2013 9:47 pm
- Contact:
Re: HoB v Barrow
Just to clear this up, Quigley doesn't have an agent. But the man you named above has been in discussions with and turned the head of Mr Quigley.Main Stand SeasonTct wrote: ↑Thu Jul 15, 2021 10:20 amDifferent agent. Steve Whiston only has one player at Barrow on his books that being Connor Brownwhitty1969 wrote: ↑Thu Jul 15, 2021 9:48 am Yep, same stunt Rooney pulled last season.
All to do with Money and having your head turned by the same greedy agent the others have.
-
whitty1969
- Platinum Member
- Posts: 2937
- Joined: Sun Apr 21, 2013 9:47 pm
- Contact:
Re: HoB v Barrow
OMG stop speculating.
He is off to Wrexham
He is off to Wrexham
-
whitty1969
- Platinum Member
- Posts: 2937
- Joined: Sun Apr 21, 2013 9:47 pm
- Contact:
Re: HoB v Barrow
OMG stop speculating.
He is off to Wrexham
He is off to Wrexham
-
whitty1969
- Platinum Member
- Posts: 2937
- Joined: Sun Apr 21, 2013 9:47 pm
- Contact:
Re: HoB v Barrow
I'm sure Cooper will bring in a decent replacement
-
Suffolk Blue
- Platinum Member
- Posts: 3806
- Joined: Sat Aug 16, 2008 6:09 pm
- Contact:
Re: HoB v Barrow
For those of us of a certain vintage this concept seems a little strange. But others would say that choosing career over cash is an outdated notion. In that respect the contract extension will have done its job because the club will have got due consideration.
I used to contract for services for many years. I was taught never to move for a better offer mid contract as it would quite rightly damage my reputation and reliability. It would have damaged my prospects even in the eyes of the clients competitors who might want to use me.
That’s the difference. There is really no collective ethical standards in football beyond the rules of play. There is no moral imperative
Re: HoB v Barrow
Absolutely this. And if hes going he probably thinks that the 'dollar' being thrown at Wrexham by the Hollywood owners and international sponsors (Expedia now added to Tik Tok as shirt sponsors) makes them a better bet in the long run even if it means a step back in the meantime. Clearly nothing is guaranteed though but they're certainly embarking on a 'journey'
-
Suffolk Blue
- Platinum Member
- Posts: 3806
- Joined: Sat Aug 16, 2008 6:09 pm
- Contact:
Re: HoB v Barrow
Even if you follow the “emerging giant” argument it doesn’t fit really. Quigley is 29. Even if Wrexham are promoted he’ll be the wrong side of 30 before he gets back to this level.
This is about the now and about money. And that’s not a criticism by the way. It’s the protestations of joining a great club as being the motivation that makes me queasy.
This is about the now and about money. And that’s not a criticism by the way. It’s the protestations of joining a great club as being the motivation that makes me queasy.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 38 guests