Mmmmmmmm I wouldn't be so confident in that personally.Bingo wrote:I bet our budget Is in the top 5 - imagine what some of our previous managers could do with a budget like that.mickycarrol wrote:Worrying read this thread. Puts a lot of doubt into people's heads, I doubt Casson is funding us as much as Cox wants and I doubt Cox wants to be here as a result as he will want to compete for promotion.worrying times I'm afraid
Paul Cox Hartlepool
-
mickycarrol
- Silver Member
- Posts: 1399
- Joined: Wed May 28, 2008 7:45 pm
- Contact:
Re: Paul Cox Hartlepool
"The trouble with referees is that they know the rules, but they dont know the game"
Bill Shankly
Bill Shankly
-
Bingo
- Platinum Member
- Posts: 4100
- Joined: Fri Jun 06, 2008 12:43 am
- Location: Failsworth, Manchester
- Contact:
Re: Paul Cox Hartlepool
I was quite happy for Cox to stay BUT if he doesn't want to be at Barrow I'd rather we have a manager that wants to manage us.
Re: Paul Cox Hartlepool
Something doesn't quite add up here.
If hartlepool asked Casson for permission then the buyout fee would have been discussed at that point. Before they even spoke to Cox. Otherwise why would they waste their time arranging a meeting, probably drafting a contract etc. They would have known the price casson wanted and would have been comfortable with that.
So that tells me, Cox didn't want to go. Either because he wanted to stay at barrow or because the money wasn't good enough.
If hartlepool asked Casson for permission then the buyout fee would have been discussed at that point. Before they even spoke to Cox. Otherwise why would they waste their time arranging a meeting, probably drafting a contract etc. They would have known the price casson wanted and would have been comfortable with that.
So that tells me, Cox didn't want to go. Either because he wanted to stay at barrow or because the money wasn't good enough.
Re: Paul Cox Hartlepool
We let our best defender in Danny Livsey go.I would have to thought if we were going to push for promotion we would have kept him.The Real Slim a former member of this forum wrote:Ste Story wrote:
Indeed. Player layer renewed contracts, one of the best managers we've had in recenrlt memory potentially on the way out, massively scaled back plans on the ground... Ambition not matching reality?
STE! Be very careful! You can't say those things on here!
Maybe letting Paul Cox talk to clubs is another way for Casson to recoup some cash.
Think Cox reaction will reflect what Casson did or not do in the January window.
- John Very Little
- Platinum Member
- Posts: 4136
- Joined: Sat Jun 07, 2008 3:32 am
- Contact:
Re: Paul Cox Hartlepool
Does anyone know what the parachute payment is the first season after a team drops out of League 2 is that Hartlepool will get?
I know its a fair bit but won't come anywhere near what the likes of Tranmere and Forest Green spent, just interested?
On the point about Livesey, he was on a good wage and wanted a 2 year contract despite being 32, not a surprise we let him go really.
Shows more ambition in letting him go as there are better players than him available and he'll not get better at his age - dropping a league shows the direction he's going.
I don't think Casson wanted to go up this season as it was too soon and would leave so much to do off the field with the ground improvements that are required for League 2 standard and this is why he never spent more cash in January which probably upset Cox.
Have no issue with Cox speaking to Hartlepool to see what they're offering (anyone would do the same) but they must've known already he had 2 years left on his contract and would've had to pay a fair amount of compensation to us?
I know its a fair bit but won't come anywhere near what the likes of Tranmere and Forest Green spent, just interested?
On the point about Livesey, he was on a good wage and wanted a 2 year contract despite being 32, not a surprise we let him go really.
Shows more ambition in letting him go as there are better players than him available and he'll not get better at his age - dropping a league shows the direction he's going.
I don't think Casson wanted to go up this season as it was too soon and would leave so much to do off the field with the ground improvements that are required for League 2 standard and this is why he never spent more cash in January which probably upset Cox.
Have no issue with Cox speaking to Hartlepool to see what they're offering (anyone would do the same) but they must've known already he had 2 years left on his contract and would've had to pay a fair amount of compensation to us?
Re: Paul Cox Hartlepool
Anyway, looks like it has all fell through according to the evening mails Facebook pages.
-
Lancaster Branch
- BarrowAFC Veteran
- Posts: 5509
- Joined: Sun Jun 15, 2008 10:15 pm
- Contact:
Re: Paul Cox Hartlepool
Aye, that's what I can't understand either.EHB wrote:Something doesn't quite add up here.
If hartlepool asked Casson for permission then the buyout fee would have been discussed at that point. Before they even spoke to Cox. Otherwise why would they waste their time arranging a meeting, probably drafting a contract etc. They would have known the price casson wanted and would have been comfortable with that.
Re: Paul Cox Hartlepool
What a life the real slim a a Ron has. Why exactly do you follow this club. Is it because you need the haters. Hahaha wimpy guy.
- The Real Slim Azza
- BarrowAFC Veteran
- Posts: 6941
- Joined: Thu Jan 01, 2009 2:07 pm
- Contact:
Re: Paul Cox Hartlepool
Are you asking questions there or just typing words in a funny order?finbar17 wrote:What a life the real slim a a Ron has. Why exactly do you follow this club. Is it because you need the haters. Hahaha wimpy guy.
Taurus excreta cerebrum vincit
BIG BADGE MISTAKE POLOS
END OF POST
BIG BADGE MISTAKE POLOS
END OF POST
-
boyliegladbach
- BarrowAFC Veteran
- Posts: 8720
- Joined: Sun Aug 01, 2010 10:07 am
- Location: Tel aviv
- Contact:
Re: Paul Cox Hartlepool
Cox might have rejected them,Lancaster Branch wrote:Aye, that's what I can't understand either.EHB wrote:Something doesn't quite add up here.
If hartlepool asked Casson for permission then the buyout fee would have been discussed at that point. Before they even spoke to Cox. Otherwise why would they waste their time arranging a meeting, probably drafting a contract etc. They would have known the price casson wanted and would have been comfortable with that.
Re: Paul Cox Hartlepool
That's What I'm getting at, yet everyone on here seems to be questionning his loyalty.
If hartlepool were willing to pay 2 years of his contract out right then they knew how much money he would be on.
Maybe he needs some credit here?
If hartlepool were willing to pay 2 years of his contract out right then they knew how much money he would be on.
Maybe he needs some credit here?
- barrowfan_chris
- Platinum Member
- Posts: 3508
- Joined: Wed May 28, 2008 5:44 pm
- Location: The Former Republic of Barrovia.
- Contact:
Re: Paul Cox Hartlepool
boyliegladbach wrote:Cox might have rejected them,Lancaster Branch wrote:
Aye, that's what I can't understand either.
Another theory is Hartlepool might have thought Cox agreeing terms we would reduce the amount we were looking for in compensation?
-
boyliegladbach
- BarrowAFC Veteran
- Posts: 8720
- Joined: Sun Aug 01, 2010 10:07 am
- Location: Tel aviv
- Contact:
Re: Paul Cox Hartlepool
The owner needs to make a statement.
I doubt that will happen.
I doubt that will happen.
- The Real Slim Azza
- BarrowAFC Veteran
- Posts: 6941
- Joined: Thu Jan 01, 2009 2:07 pm
- Contact:
Re: Paul Cox Hartlepool
boyliegladbach wrote:The owner needs to make a statement.
I doubt that will happen.
Exactly what should be happening. The contact between the club and its fans is non existent, there will only be one when the NWEMAIL prompts them.
Taurus excreta cerebrum vincit
BIG BADGE MISTAKE POLOS
END OF POST
BIG BADGE MISTAKE POLOS
END OF POST
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Richard Ingham and 32 guests