Page 2 of 2
Re: FA Charge
Posted: Wed Feb 03, 2021 12:28 pm
by SKIPPER
Cue EM front page headline.
Re: FA Charge
Posted: Wed Feb 03, 2021 12:51 pm
by mickmike wilson
Bombadel wrote: ↑Tue Feb 02, 2021 7:13 pm
Remember Rooney (utd version) getting a second yellow for sarcastically clapping the ref. Probably an argument for both sides, without that fire in the belly of Kay, he wouldn’t be the passionate player he is today, just needs to control it a bit.
There’s having spirit, fight (in the sporting never give up sense) & passion, Then theirs being a spoilt brat & Kay falls into the latter & it will stunt his career if he’s not careful.
We need a more controlled Kay & if no improvement Id bin him off IMHO
Re: FA Charge
Posted: Wed Feb 03, 2021 2:41 pm
by Moribund
Hadrian wrote: ↑Wed Feb 03, 2021 10:21 am
Moribund wrote: ↑Tue Feb 02, 2021 10:36 pm
Was it not when three or four players sprinted towards the ref screaming? Still, seems a bit much to be fined for that.
If so, it might depend what they were screaming...
Well if it was anything offensive, I'd imagine they would've been carded. Seems a bit of a mystery.
Re: FA Charge
Posted: Wed Feb 03, 2021 3:46 pm
by blue blue boy
I suspect it may have something to do with the proximity of the players to the referee in these COVID affected times. As previously said, if what was said/screamed to the ref falls under offensive insulting or abusive language the it would have been
Re: FA Charge
Posted: Wed Feb 03, 2021 6:22 pm
by saltcellar
blue blue boy wrote: ↑Wed Feb 03, 2021 3:46 pm
I suspect it may have something to do with the proximity of the players to the referee in these COVID affected times. As previously said, if what was said/screamed to the ref falls under offensive insulting or abusive language the it would have been
Josh Kay was given a yellow card for what he said.
Nothing shown to Scott Quigley or Jamie Devitt for their remonstration with the referee or Matty Platt who arrived on the scene later.
Re: FA Charge
Posted: Wed Feb 03, 2021 6:33 pm
by spirit of 1990
Not sure how true this is but I’ve been told whatever the incident was, it happened in the tunnel after the game had finished.
Re: FA Charge
Posted: Wed Feb 03, 2021 7:20 pm
by saltcellar
spirit of 1990 wrote: ↑Wed Feb 03, 2021 6:33 pm
Not sure how true this is but I’ve been told whatever the incident was, it happened in the tunnel after the game had finished.
I didn't think Barrow players came out of a tunnel.
Bradford came out of one, but the Barrow player came out of a different building down a lot of steps to reach the pitch.
I would assume that would be the way they would also leave.
Re: FA Charge
Posted: Wed Feb 03, 2021 11:22 pm
by Bradders
Let’s get a game on pleeeeease.
Re: FA Charge
Posted: Thu Feb 04, 2021 9:08 am
by Jim
spirit of 1990 wrote: ↑Wed Feb 03, 2021 6:33 pm
Not sure how true this is but I’ve been told whatever the incident was, it happened in the tunnel after the game had finished.
Sounds much more likely. Perhaps the club could give us some more details of the charge, if only to end the speculation.
Re: FA Charge
Posted: Thu Feb 04, 2021 9:31 am
by chipmunx
Jim wrote: ↑Thu Feb 04, 2021 9:08 am
spirit of 1990 wrote: ↑Wed Feb 03, 2021 6:33 pm
Not sure how true this is but I’ve been told whatever the incident was, it happened in the tunnel after the game had finished.
Sounds much more likely. Perhaps the club could give us some more details of the charge, if only to end the speculation.
If you read the charge doesn't it say failure to control players in the 90th minute of the game?
That means it's during game play not in the tunnel afterwards.
If you look at the match video the officials were still on the pitch talking to Jolley when the players were already going into the changing rooms.
It's pretty safe to say it was the penalty incident where Quigley complained then Hardcastle and Kay rushed in and Kay said too much and got booked, which actually occurred in the 90th minute.
Re: FA Charge
Posted: Thu Feb 04, 2021 1:18 pm
by saltcellar
chipmunx wrote: ↑Thu Feb 04, 2021 9:31 am
Jim wrote: ↑Thu Feb 04, 2021 9:08 am
Sounds much more likely. Perhaps the club could give us some more details of the charge, if only to end the speculation.
If you read the charge doesn't it say failure to control players in the 90th minute of the game?
That means it's during game play not in the tunnel afterwards.
If you look at the match video the officials were still on the pitch talking to Jolley when the players were already going into the changing rooms.
It's pretty safe to say it was the penalty incident where Quigley complained then Hardcastle and Kay rushed in and Kay said too much and got booked, which actually occurred in the 90th minute.
It wasn't Hardcastle.
He had been subbed in the 68th minute.
Quigley, Kay and Devitt were remonstrating with the referee.
Later Platt joined in.
Re: FA Charge
Posted: Thu Feb 04, 2021 1:27 pm
by chipmunx
saltcellar wrote: ↑Thu Feb 04, 2021 1:18 pm
chipmunx wrote: ↑Thu Feb 04, 2021 9:31 am
If you read the charge doesn't it say failure to control players in the 90th minute of the game?
That means it's during game play not in the tunnel afterwards.
If you look at the match video the officials were still on the pitch talking to Jolley when the players were already going into the changing rooms.
It's pretty safe to say it was the penalty incident where Quigley complained then Hardcastle and Kay rushed in and Kay said too much and got booked, which actually occurred in the 90th minute.
It wasn't Hardcastle.
He had been subbed in the 68th minute.
Quigley, Kay and Devitt were remonstrating with the referee.
Later Platt joined in.
yes you're right - I didn't count Platt as he came over as captain (i think) and didn't jump up and down like a spoilt kid. It was Kay who got us he charge i think.
Re: FA Charge
Posted: Thu Feb 04, 2021 2:08 pm
by Middleton Nick
There's a surprise
Re: FA Charge
Posted: Thu Feb 04, 2021 3:00 pm
by saltcellar
saltcellar wrote: ↑Tue Feb 02, 2021 6:21 pm
Time Lord wrote: ↑Tue Feb 02, 2021 6:15 pm
That`s a £1000 standard penalty then for league 2 unless they deny it and are found guilty in which case it is £1500
The players concerned should pay it.
Maybe that way, they might have second thoughts doing it again.
Which is why I posted this earlier
