Steeley wrote:1AFC wrote:
Were we on top, creating plenty of chances? In my eyes and the other 887 people's eyes, we were out the two, the winning team at the time and controlling the game?
Introducing subs at that time would have been a bad error.
How on earth do you know it would have been a bad error? Do you think it would have made us lose the game? Which we did anyway...
Regardless of whether we should have made subs or not, mcevilly walking off the bench and onto the pitch without even jogging down the line or doing any warm up is unacceptable, no wonder he was dog [SwearFilter]. DB is absolutely clueless when it comes to subs.
Yawn, heard it all before. Let me guess;
- Hurst can't catch a ball a cross,
- Ruthers doesn't put the effort in,
- Mcevily is fat, and does nothing,
- DB is useless (oh sorry, you have already mentioned that)
- BoD need to go as they are useless,
- attendances are aweful and need to let people under the age of 16 free,
Have I forgotten out, before you mention it?
Oh yeah the sign for the next home game hasn't been changed....
Start supporting the club for Christ sake. The lads played very well yesterday, and deserve the credit. Tactics were right, and remember we don't have a bench full of decent players that can change games, nor we had a prolific goalscorer on.
:flag: