Would this be a viable alternative to redeveloping Holker Street

For all things Barrow AFC. Keep discussions civil and fair, we're all Barrow aren't we!
User avatar
Steelworks End
BarrowAFC Veteran
Posts: 5959
Joined: Wed May 28, 2008 6:03 pm
Location: Twickenham
Contact:

Re: Would this be a viable alternative to redeveloping Holker Street

Post by Steelworks End » Sun May 22, 2016 8:09 pm

walney rock wrote:We will still be having this debate in 5+ years time :roll:
Well why not? We've been discussing this for the last couple of decades or so already! :)

mightywhite
Veteran Member
Posts: 687
Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2008 1:54 pm
Location: Manchester
Contact:

Re: Would this be a viable alternative to redeveloping Holker Street

Post by mightywhite » Sun May 22, 2016 9:37 pm

in reality most pitches are now a hybrid surface with woven fibers holding grass in place to produce a firm playing surface they are on the whole very good, never cut up, great for both sports. Headingley has one.

User avatar
Steeley
BarrowAFC Veteran
Posts: 5735
Joined: Wed May 28, 2008 4:27 pm
Location: Manchester
Contact:

Re: Would this be a viable alternative to redeveloping Holker Street

Post by Steeley » Sun May 22, 2016 10:33 pm

There's plenty of grounds out there nowadays that have rugby and football on.
Bish=God

Bingo
Platinum Member
Posts: 4092
Joined: Fri Jun 06, 2008 12:43 am
Location: Failsworth, Manchester
Contact:

Re: Would this be a viable alternative to redeveloping Holker Street

Post by Bingo » Mon May 23, 2016 1:09 am

I wouldn't be in favour of it myself I'd prefer us to get a better Holker street

It is frustration that it's all a bit slow but any new look ground will last for years and years to come so rather it be spot on first.

There is a Barrow problem also of not feeling we are good enough that a crisis or disaster is just around the corner - it's a town thing too the whole town is 25 years behind everywhere else

blue nige
BarrowAFC Veteran
Posts: 6958
Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2013 7:21 pm
Location: Antarctica
Contact:

Re: Would this be a viable alternative to redeveloping Holker Street

Post by blue nige » Mon May 23, 2016 7:26 am

Hadrian wrote:How can you come up with three options until you are sure what land and access to it is available, bluenige?

While I am hopeful that supporters might be consulted on options (and, possibly more importantly, some of the details) I think we can be sure the owner will be taking the decisions.


Listen i didn`t say or make any of the previous quotes/details about future alterations to the ground it was one person Paul Casson,so don`t try to pick up on things i have said when it`s our owner who has made all comments regarding this!

I don`t mind being criticised on things i have stated but as usual people on here get at the wrong person(s) ,but i forgot we are not allowed to speak out against Paul Casson even if they are legitimate claims!

Hadrian
Platinum Member
Posts: 4738
Joined: Tue Jun 17, 2008 5:32 pm
Contact:

Re: Would this be a viable alternative to redeveloping Holker Street

Post by Hadrian » Mon May 23, 2016 5:44 pm

Not criticising you. It was a simple, if possibly rhetorical, question.

Don't think anyone needs to be 'got at'; sure folks will be doing their best without a magic wand.

mickmike wilson
BarrowAFC Veteran
Posts: 5434
Joined: Thu May 29, 2008 2:56 pm
Location: The live music capital of the world, AUSTIN, TEXAS
Contact:

Re: Would this be a viable alternative to redeveloping Holker Street

Post by mickmike wilson » Mon May 23, 2016 6:34 pm

It IMO makes financial & practical sense for both codes to share facilities, Yes there will be some sound logical reasons & some daft prejudices as why we shouldn't, as we have a small isolated catchment area we should build a community shared stadium.

Advantages will outweigh the Negatives

Ralph
Gold Member
Posts: 1804
Joined: Thu May 29, 2008 7:07 am
Location: New Zealand
Contact:

Re: Would this be a viable alternative to redeveloping Holker Street

Post by Ralph » Tue May 24, 2016 3:47 am

Graythwaite Nick wrote:1-0 to you John.Has it been accepted in the Football League?
Yes, and in the Premier League, IIRC, Leicester City play on this type of surface.

Hadrian
Platinum Member
Posts: 4738
Joined: Tue Jun 17, 2008 5:32 pm
Contact:

Re: Would this be a viable alternative to redeveloping Holker Street

Post by Hadrian » Tue May 24, 2016 9:41 am

I think the Football League chairman voted not to accept artificial pitches after indications were that they would do so. I haven't heard of EPL approving them.

As I understand it, Desso and other suppliers produce fully artificial surfaces and hybrid grass pitches where natural turf is strengthened by artificial fibres. A number of EPL and FL clubs use the latter which is classed as a grass pitch.

DaveP
Gold Member
Posts: 2088
Joined: Wed May 28, 2008 4:26 pm
Contact:

Re: Would this be a viable alternative to redeveloping Holker Street

Post by DaveP » Tue May 24, 2016 10:03 am

I'm just thinking out loud and of course haven't lived in Barrow since 1972 and so don't know what various "green" areas are currently used for.

There is a pretty huge area on Schneider Road (other side of the ressie) which currently seems to house football pitches etc which seems even bigger than the Holker Street footprint. Is there any possibility of building here?

Or is that a complete non starter?

User avatar
Ste Story
BarrowAFC.net Administrator
Posts: 8191
Joined: Wed May 28, 2008 1:53 pm
Location: Costa Del Barrow
Contact:

Re: Would this be a viable alternative to redeveloping Holker Street

Post by Ste Story » Tue May 24, 2016 11:04 am

DaveP wrote:I'm just thinking out loud and of course haven't lived in Barrow since 1972 and so don't know what various "green" areas are currently used for.

There is a pretty huge area on Schneider Road (other side of the ressie) which currently seems to house football pitches etc which seems even bigger than the Holker Street footprint. Is there any possibility of building here?

Or is that a complete non starter?
I might have completely made this up, but I've got something in my head that the greenfields next to the resser used to be a reservoir itself, possibly used by the steelworks company or something? And was filled in at some point. If so not sure on the viability of building on such a place with the lack of decent solid foundation to dig down into?

But location and space wise it'd be very good I agree. Could even have access road direct from the A590, as theres something of a track up through the old derelict building there.
:scarf:
Ste Story | Professional Website & Graphic Design in Barrow - www.stephenstory.co.uk

User avatar
Steelworks End
BarrowAFC Veteran
Posts: 5959
Joined: Wed May 28, 2008 6:03 pm
Location: Twickenham
Contact:

Re: Would this be a viable alternative to redeveloping Holker Street

Post by Steelworks End » Tue May 24, 2016 11:12 am

Ste Story wrote: I might have completely made this up, but I've got something in my head that the greenfields next to the resser used to be a reservoir itself.
Yes it was indeed a reservoir, filled in a number of years ago (I can't remember when).

As a nipper, I was told that one reservoir was for cold water and the other for hot water. :)

Renfrew Refugee
Member
Posts: 242
Joined: Wed Jun 11, 2008 1:12 pm
Location: Where the job takes me
Contact:

Re: Would this be a viable alternative to redeveloping Holker Street

Post by Renfrew Refugee » Tue May 24, 2016 11:33 am

This was going to be the original ground share plan back to back stand with 2 pitches, shafted by the council who were going to develop Cavendish Dock at the same time during the late 1980,s

User avatar
The Real Slim Azza
BarrowAFC Veteran
Posts: 6941
Joined: Thu Jan 01, 2009 2:07 pm
Contact:

Re: Would this be a viable alternative to redeveloping Holker Street

Post by The Real Slim Azza » Tue May 24, 2016 3:14 pm

Ormsgill pitches used to be a tip.

There was a story of a white bulge coming out of the ground on one if the pitches. Players just used to ignore it until one day they dug out a fridge.
Taurus excreta cerebrum vincit
BIG BADGE MISTAKE POLOS
END OF POST

Gasser
Member
Posts: 181
Joined: Sat Nov 01, 2008 8:22 pm
Contact:

Re: Would this be a viable alternative to redeveloping Holker Street

Post by Gasser » Tue May 24, 2016 3:51 pm

:) Ormsgill pitches are built on a landfill site.
I remember running through,one on one with the keeper and tripping over an old exposed piece of carpet.
Don't know if that would be classed as an artificial surface :)

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: McMark and 23 guests