Well saidHadrian wrote: ↑Sat Feb 13, 2021 11:37 amSo capitalising A BILLION POUNDS referring to an article you once read but can't quite remember. How very Internet!mickmike wilson wrote: ↑Fri Feb 12, 2021 6:48 pm
It’s been a long while since I read the article but basically most of the money disappeared along with these 2 week old companies who had zero previous experience in providing PPE, Total con job.
Shame we don't have a National Audit Office in the UK.
In an emergency situation, the government will have 'wasted' loads of money in trying to secure ventilators that in the end weren't needed or couldn't be made to work as intended, buying any PPE from anywhere - some of which wasn't up to the task, buying options for vaccines that didn't get in the end get through the trials or couldn't be produced soon enough, all in a scramble against competition from around the world last spring.
Of course they could have followed the usual civil service routine by consulting widely, devising a specification, asking for competitive tenders, assessing the results and choosing suppliers who were by then too busy. The first face masks might be arriving about now...
Furloughing players
-
liverpoolann
- Bronze Member
- Posts: 910
- Joined: Sat Aug 08, 2015 11:13 pm
- Contact:
Re: Furloughing players
Re: Furloughing players
Have a look at (Double Down News) feed on this subject.Hadrian wrote: ↑Sat Feb 13, 2021 11:37 amSo capitalising A BILLION POUNDS referring to an article you once read but can't quite remember. How very Internet!mickmike wilson wrote: ↑Fri Feb 12, 2021 6:48 pm
It’s been a long while since I read the article but basically most of the money disappeared along with these 2 week old companies who had zero previous experience in providing PPE, Total con job.
Shame we don't have a National Audit Office in the UK.
In an emergency situation, the government will have 'wasted' loads of money in trying to secure ventilators that in the end weren't needed or couldn't be made to work as intended, buying any PPE from anywhere - some of which wasn't up to the task, buying options for vaccines that didn't get in the end get through the trials or couldn't be produced soon enough, all in a scramble against competition from around the world last spring.
Of course they could have followed the usual civil service routine by consulting widely, devising a specification, asking for competitive tenders, assessing the results and choosing suppliers who were by then too busy. The first face masks might be arriving about now...
Re: Furloughing players
Re: Furloughing players
The likes of DD, The Canary, Guido Fawkes, etc can offer alternative views but in general I think I'll stick with the professionals for my news, thanks.
-
liverpoolann
- Bronze Member
- Posts: 910
- Joined: Sat Aug 08, 2015 11:13 pm
- Contact:
Re: Furloughing players
Coming from Kent (Dover my home town first place I ever watched non league football) I feel for the club and also Maidstone and Tonbridge whose grounds i also visited frequently in my ground hopping days..It is very sad for the fans and credit to Mr Parmenter for taking action to protect his club knowing that this would ruffle feathers in the national league and open a can of worms.It is difficult to foresee outcome of one team not playing and others employing out of contract players in order to fulfill fixtures for free.The integrity of the league and results will not be relevant when there are still so many games to play.Whether we stay up hopefully the right way by our own efforts or as a result of multiple financial misfortunes of others I think it is a very sad day for non league football.
-
Zuluwarrior
- New Member
- Posts: 20
- Joined: Tue Mar 12, 2019 11:06 pm
- Contact:
Re: Furloughing players
It’s just wrong we can’t justify signing lots of new players then using the furlough scheme (designed to help those in real need) to sack off players we don’t feel like using ...
-
blue nige
- BarrowAFC Veteran
- Posts: 7085
- Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2013 7:21 pm
- Location: Antarctica
- Contact:
Re: Furloughing players
The trouble is (i`m being genuine !) BBC, SKY only tell us what they want for instance when the "black lives matter protests were going on they (the bbc) cropped a photo on twitter to minipulate it to look like something else! that`s the way everythings going now !
Re: Furloughing players
Can we furlough the rest of the squad, play the non-playing staff and go down with less debt at least?
Re: Furloughing players
EFl website has the squad lists
Banks, Barry, Beadling, Brammall, Brough, Davies, Devitt, Dixon, Donahue, Eardley, Hardcastle, James, Jones, Kay, Lillis, Ndjoli, Ntlhe, Platt, Quigley, Taylor
Under21 Burns, Goodridge, Moloney, Sea, Thomas, Wilson
Banks, Barry, Beadling, Brammall, Brough, Davies, Devitt, Dixon, Donahue, Eardley, Hardcastle, James, Jones, Kay, Lillis, Ndjoli, Ntlhe, Platt, Quigley, Taylor
Under21 Burns, Goodridge, Moloney, Sea, Thomas, Wilson
- Wintergreen
- BarrowAFC Veteran
- Posts: 7477
- Joined: Fri May 30, 2008 12:38 pm
- Location: The Blue Planet
- Contact:
Re: Furloughing players
Surely it's either legal or illegal, you're either entitled to do it or you aren't. There are a lot of loopholes and rule-bending in the world of business, usually around taxation. Tough on some great players obviously but then again if better opportunities come along for them they will take it; as we have seen and to our great cost recently.Zuluwarrior wrote: ↑Mon Feb 15, 2021 9:04 am It’s just wrong we can’t justify signing lots of new players then using the furlough scheme (designed to help those in real need) to sack off players we don’t feel like using ...
We will foller the soccer, over land and sea...
Re: Furloughing players
The new players were not signed in order to put others on furlough. It has been explained several times (though it doesn't placate the conspiracy theorists) that the plan was to loan the surplus players to NL/NLN clubs. This went pear-shaped when finances of those clubs hit the buffers with meltdown over covid grants. The prospect of the season being curtailed meant all transfers/loans stopped.By then the signing of new players was already advanced and furloughing was the only answer.Zuluwarrior wrote: ↑Mon Feb 15, 2021 9:04 am It’s just wrong we can’t justify signing lots of new players then using the furlough scheme (designed to help those in real need) to sack off players we don’t feel like using ...
-
boyliegladbach
- BarrowAFC Veteran
- Posts: 8720
- Joined: Sun Aug 01, 2010 10:07 am
- Location: Tel aviv
- Contact:
Re: Furloughing players
Sounds like a poor plan.SKIPPER wrote: ↑Thu Feb 18, 2021 9:10 amThe new players were not signed in order to put others on furlough. It has been explained several times (though it doesn't placate the conspiracy theorists) that the plan was to loan the surplus players to NL/NLN clubs. This went pear-shaped when finances of those clubs hit the buffers with meltdown over covid grants. The prospect of the season being curtailed meant all transfers/loans stopped.By then the signing of new players was already advanced and furloughing was the only answer.Zuluwarrior wrote: ↑Mon Feb 15, 2021 9:04 am It’s just wrong we can’t justify signing lots of new players then using the furlough scheme (designed to help those in real need) to sack off players we don’t feel like using ...
Still doesn't make it right.
One out one in.
Re: Furloughing players
Nonsense! The likelihood of being able to farm players out (and a lot of them) has been vastly reduced all season and hasn't just suddenly happened now. We knew perfectly well when we signed the new players that we were going to struggle to offload the existing players that Jolley didn't want.SKIPPER wrote: ↑Thu Feb 18, 2021 9:10 amThe new players were not signed in order to put others on furlough. It has been explained several times (though it doesn't placate the conspiracy theorists) that the plan was to loan the surplus players to NL/NLN clubs. This went pear-shaped when finances of those clubs hit the buffers with meltdown over covid grants. The prospect of the season being curtailed meant all transfers/loans stopped.By then the signing of new players was already advanced and furloughing was the only answer.Zuluwarrior wrote: ↑Mon Feb 15, 2021 9:04 am It’s just wrong we can’t justify signing lots of new players then using the furlough scheme (designed to help those in real need) to sack off players we don’t feel like using ...
Re: Furloughing players
Some people going all Lady Button on here.
Re: Furloughing players
Hopefully they will answer some questions about it in the Q&A session.
Popular side since '03.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 12 guests