That looks great, a massive improvement, well done to the club = positive.
Some of the bickering and sniping on here is unbelievable, I think we need the season to start so that we can all stop falling out = negative.
That looks great, a massive improvement, well done to the club = positive.
Your very welcomeblue nige wrote: ↑Thu Jul 06, 2023 7:28 pmI didn't make the statement but if you're trying to be clever, look at the photos he took and please explain the danger!, bye the way you do need fences and signs or we as a club would have been fined Thank you for your attempt at being smugbarrow-mike wrote: ↑Thu Jul 06, 2023 5:42 pm![]()
You don't need fences or warning signs just a bit of common sense![]()
Terrible? Really? That's a very strong word to use. I agree that the photo we are given on the previous page might not suggest we can tick the box marked "perfection" but I would definitely want to emphasise the positives here. For that reason, instead of "terrible" I would prefer to use the word "remarkable" . . . remarkable compared to the bomb-site of a ground in early 1972, remarkable to see such progress when we think that it is still less than 10 years ago that we seemed to be heading for oblivion after losing 0-6 at home to Gainsborough Trinity, remarkable when we look back to just the end of last season when we had very limited viewing provision from those two areas of the ground. Remarkable effort. Well done to all concerned.bluebird90 wrote: ↑Fri Jul 07, 2023 12:48 pm On one hand it gets the job done and meets requirements. On the other, they look terrible. We’ll soon be calling it the 50 shades of blue stadium. Maybe that’s why Wards often sponsor us.
Terribly well put PJpjdaly wrote: ↑Fri Jul 07, 2023 1:23 pmTerrible? Really? That's a very strong word to use. I agree that the photo we are given on the previous page might not suggest we can tick the box marked "perfection" but I would definitely want to emphasise the positives here. For that reason, instead of "terrible" I would prefer to use the word "remarkable" . . . remarkable compared to the bomb-site of a ground in early 1972, remarkable to see such progress when we think that it is still less than 10 years ago that we seemed to be heading for oblivion after losing 0-6 at home to Gainsborough Trinity, remarkable when we look back to just the end of last season when we had very limited viewing provision from those two areas of the ground. Remarkable effort. Well done to all concerned.bluebird90 wrote: ↑Fri Jul 07, 2023 12:48 pm On one hand it gets the job done and meets requirements. On the other, they look terrible. We’ll soon be calling it the 50 shades of blue stadium. Maybe that’s why Wards often sponsor us.
jaycarter may be referring to gaps in the roof coverings of the two new wing stands, which may or may not be complete at the time of the photo.bluessupporter wrote: ↑Fri Jul 07, 2023 12:32 pm No different to now. If you look the two aisles lead to the gates, so there has to be gaps.
Total sense - as always Paul.pjdaly wrote: ↑Fri Jul 07, 2023 1:23 pmTerrible? Really? That's a very strong word to use. I agree that the photo we are given on the previous page might not suggest we can tick the box marked "perfection" but I would definitely want to emphasise the positives here. For that reason, instead of "terrible" I would prefer to use the word "remarkable" . . . remarkable compared to the bomb-site of a ground in early 1972, remarkable to see such progress when we think that it is still less than 10 years ago that we seemed to be heading for oblivion after losing 0-6 at home to Gainsborough Trinity, remarkable when we look back to just the end of last season when we had very limited viewing provision from those two areas of the ground. Remarkable effort. Well done to all concerned.bluebird90 wrote: ↑Fri Jul 07, 2023 12:48 pm On one hand it gets the job done and meets requirements. On the other, they look terrible. We’ll soon be calling it the 50 shades of blue stadium. Maybe that’s why Wards often sponsor us.
Users browsing this forum: Alwaysblue and 51 guests