Fletcher injured his shoulder at Swindon and was ruled out for four weeks. Agreed when he was up there before his injury he looked decent a threat and he’s not even a natural striker, which says a lot about the others. I’m holding on to some hope that Whitfield probably the only genuine bit of quality we have, and Fletcher returning will make us a better attacking team. Even Scott Smith who was improving and has another 2/3 weeks out? He’s a better option than Earing who just doesn’t contribute or show for the ball and hides for me. Anonymous.Hawcoat wrote: ↑Wed Feb 18, 2026 8:07 am Fair play to the manager realised after 30 mins the shape was all wrong. Earing was rightfully dragged he was having a shocker. I didn't agree with Barkhuizen coming off for Mahoney especially in a 442, Tom's ability to get to the by line and whip balls in should be exactly what the two centers forwards want, plus Mahoneys want to slow the play down all the time and mess about is irritating. Having said all that we looked a much better sides playing a 442 what I saw in the second half you could watch every week.
Takes us back to recruitment no right back on the books ties the manages hand. The gaffer is clearly prepared to do what it takes however which instills me with confidence even if we didn't get the result last night.
Is Fletcher injured? For me he can become a decent striker who out of all our options seems like the only one really desperate to score. I think it would be a shame if we didn't persist with him and someone else got him, reaping the rewards.
Also agree was a strange one putting Mahoney on who just wants to come inside and doesn’t offer anything, Barkhuizen hasn’t been great but at least he stays wide and gets forward and can get a cross in.